"The whole point of the gay rights movement was to convince people and to persuade people that gay people deserved equal rights. And we did that. And now it’s gone from persuasion to coercion."
— Real Time with Bill Maher (@RealTimers) June 21, 2022
Watch @jkirchick and @krystalball discuss the corporate cooptation of #PrideMonth: pic.twitter.com/usm2YhtJxV
Author Archives: Stephen H. Miller
LGBTQIA+ Is All About Serving the Progressive Democrat Party
Virginia’s Gov. Glenn Youngkin hosted a Virginia pride reception, angering LGBTQ woke-progressive-Democrat groups who boycotted because he’s, you know, a Republican.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/youngkin-pride-events-angering-lgbtq-groups
>>Last week, Youngkin also traveled to Virginia Beach to meet with the Log Cabin Republicans, a conservative LGBTQ group.
“The Democrat Party and the people on the left, the left-leaning organizations, they all lambaste Republicans for not embracing the gay community. And then when one does, they lambaste, and they lose their minds,” Casey Flores, president of the group’s new Richmond chapter, told WRC-TV.
Meanwhile, more liberal LGBTQ groups in Virginia issued press releases announcing that they would not attend the Pride month reception at the Virginia Capitol.<<
7 Comments
Saying What Needs to Be Said
9 Comments
History, Real and Revised
In her New York Times review, Alexandra Jacobs complains, “This is overwhelmingly a gallery of the white male gaytriarchy, with lesbians and people of color mostly on the sidelines.”
Because gay (mostly white) men who were the primary targets of the purge of federal employees during that time don’t deserve to have their history told. Is that clear enough?
More. Rob Wolfe complains in the Washington Monthly that Kirchick is insufficiently intersectional. But in criticizing Kirchick’s views against making everything about the entire progressive agenda, he shows why Kirchick has gotten it right. Wolfe writes:
Kirchick has written a comprehensive and deeply humane work of history, but he doesn’t extend this question to the present day. His other writings suggest, unfortunately, that this may be because he lacks the same compassion for some of today’s marginalized groups. In a 2019 Atlantic article titled “The Struggle for Gay Rights Is Over,” Kirchick proclaimed that America is becoming a “post-gay country,” where same-sex marriage is legal, an “out” gay man can be a credible presidential candidate, and 70 percent of Americans say homosexuality should be accepted. With so many victories, Kirchick accuses present-day activists of “mission creep”—of pushing forward with largely irrelevant struggles, refusing to accept that they have already won. He writes, “For many of those whose political identities have been shaped by crusades against government discrimination and pervasive societal ignorance, victimhood is too essential an identity to be so easily discarded.”
Exactly.
3 Comments
Free Speech Is the Bedrock of Freedom
4 Comments
Yes, It’s Pride Month
More. Photos from a “child friendly” drag show hosted at a Dallas gay bar. Does this look like a healthy experience for the kids? (The neon sign reads “It’s Not Gonna Lick Itself”).
A drag queen drops it low for children and takes their money—
— Tayler Hansen 🇺🇸 (@TaylerUSA) June 4, 2022
This is not even the worst footage to come out of the event believe it or not. pic.twitter.com/uIodp84Naf
Pride month sees spike in drag queen events for childrenhttps://t.co/ZgM0RQuDkU pic.twitter.com/sDkH8br5I5
— The Washington Times (@WashTimes) June 8, 2022
I 100% agree that drag shows are NOT for kids… and the few fringe voices who suggest otherwise are actually harming the LGBT community by making us all seem like weirdo groomers when most sane everyday LGBT people would reject this nonsense. https://t.co/M4HGa9g20M
— Brad Polumbo 🇺🇸⚽️🏳️🌈 (@brad_polumbo) June 8, 2022
More.A “family friendly” drag show? https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1537895794400821250.
We shouldn't use euphemisms: this is a male-to-female transvestite strip show with children in attendance.pic.twitter.com/9Vx2oqB6KT
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) June 17, 2022
2 Comments
Ricky Gervais and the Outrage Mobs
🤣🤣 All hell is about to break lose. pic.twitter.com/grozKb6Rip
— Aja 🇯🇲🇬🇧⚢💚🤍💜🦖 (@Aja02537920) May 24, 2022
A self styled ‘champion of women’s rights’ and yet she doesn’t seem to know what a woman is 🤦🧐 https://t.co/63KmcMDS8o
— Scott Benton MP 🇬🇧🏴 🍊 (@ScottBentonMP) May 27, 2022
0 Comments
How Bad Could This Get?
1 Comment
Bill Maher Takes on the Gender Rads
“[I]t’s okay to ask questions about something that’s very new and involves children. The answer can’t always be that anyone from a marginalized community is automatically right, trump card, mic drop, end of discussion. Because we’re literally experimenting on children. Maybe that’s why Sweden and Finland have stopped giving puberty blockers to kids. Because we just don’t know much about the long-term effects, although common sense should tell you that when you reverse the course of raging hormones, there’s going to be problems. We do know it hinders the development of bone density — which is kind of important if you like having a skeleton — fertility and the ability to have an orgasm seem also to be affected. This isn’t just a lifestyle decision. It’s medical. Weighing trade-offs is not bigotry.”
0 Comments
Urvashi Vaid, Reconsidered
The WaPo’s obit for former (then) NGLTF leader Urvashi Vaid. The paper’s obits for conservatives tend to include critical points, but none in this hagiography. Vaid, however, was pretty vicious toward gay conservatives, moderates, libertarians or anyone who disagreed with her.
In her book Virtual Equality, she complained, “Since I left [NGLTF], conservative columnists like Paul Varnell, Bruce Bawer, and Stephen Miller have continued to attack me personally, even though they have never spoken with me, worked with me, or talked to many of the people I have worked with.”
I had, in fact, spoken to her—we had been on a panel together at an AIDS-era conference. But really, who thinks you have to speak to a public figure before criticizing them based on their public acts and writings? Certainly not Vaid when she lashed out at others.
In an article titled “The Status Quo of the Status Queer” in Gay Community News, Vaid called for “a full-scale frontal assault” against “the coming of a racist, sexist gay and lesbian Right.” I criticized her for that in Christopher Street, which may be what got me into her book.
Vaid was at best a lukewarm and late-to-the-game supporter of same-sex marriage and (especially) gays in the military, getting onboard when it became untenable not to do so. These were, after all, initially seen as assimilationist goals, championed by gay and lesbian conservatives and moderates and dismissed by radicals.
To her credit, she was involved in AIDS activism and lobbying for increased AIDS funding, as the obit highlights, but NGLTF was a secondary player while ACT-UP and its offshoots were the power drivers.
Vaid’s focus was on what we now call intersectional activism, and forming a broad coalition of leftwing progressives for economic and societal transformation. She once described her politics as “anarcho-syndicalist,” a strand of utopian Marxism.
As for gay and lesbian legal equality, credit groups like the early HRC (before it became a Democratic front group), Freedom to Marry and Lambda Legal, along with Log Cabin Republicans and others, for moving the needle forward, not Vaid.