Transgender Issues
LGBTQ+, LGBT, or LGB? A Defense of Gay Identity [Extended Version]
I’ve published in my Substack a longer version of my July 30 IGF CultureWatch post. I’ll leave the original post up but recommended clicking on the extended Substack version, linked to below.
One of the additions in the Substack version is a discussion of the Log Cabin Republicans announcement that they will now label themselves as an advocacy organization for LGB Republicans and conservatives, dropping the “T” they added to their self-description in 2015, and the reasons behind this decision.
And this: “Why Progressive Activists Are BIG MAD That Log Cabin Republicans Dropped the “T” And Why Gays Are Happy About It.”
0 Comments
LGBTQ+, LGBT, or LGB? The Loss of Gay Identity
Matthew Vines, in a Substack follow-up to his controversial New York Times op-ed arguing against “Queer” as an identity designation, tries to make the case for an “LGBT” identity coalition, without the anti-normative “Q+” that simply seeks to elevate transgressiveness.
What Vines doesn’t want to grapple with, however, is how transgenderism, or gender-identity ideology, itself undermines the concept of same-sex attraction as well as gay/lesbian and women’s rights.
Encouraging gender-nonconforming children to consider whether they were “born in the wrong body,” as many progressive school districts now do (with or without parental consent) followed by social transitioning that puts proto-gay or just gender-confused kids on the road to medicalization; allowing biological males who identify as female (often with limited or even without various medicalizations) to participate in girls’/women’s sports and have access to female-only spaces; and demanding that sexual attraction be defined by gender identity, not biological sex, are now all fundamental tenets of the “T” advocacy embedded in “LGBT.”
Which is why the growing LGB counter-movement goes its own way, without T and Q+.
0 Comments
The Fight Isn’t Over
0 Comments
Supreme Court: States Can Bar Boys from Girls’ Sports
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states can limit public school and college girls’ and women’s sporting competition to biological females.
"The science is pretty clear that men don't have athletic advantage over women"
— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) June 29, 2026
They just say meaningless words they think sound good.
Look at her face when she says it. She doesn't believe it. But for a reason I don't understand, this is the hill they've chosen to die on. https://t.co/z0SvHhklGO
A welcome shift towards clarity and accuracy in language ⤵️ https://t.co/wqn1JWbEui
— LGB Alliance USA (@LGBAlliance_USA) June 30, 2026
Before reporting on the transgender case, NBC actually gave an effective trigger warning that it would be quoting the court in the use of terms like "biological male" and "biological female." https://t.co/bN4NImmroF This is how the press becomes a parody of itself.
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) July 1, 2026
What the NAACP is calling for passing the Equality Act is anything but Equal. It gives all male individuals special privileges that override girls/women’s hard earned rights. It also strips all homosexual rights where we would have to include people of the opposite sex. Hell NO! https://t.co/mIkI8KXx8P
— Schrödinger's Lesbian ⚢ (@IsleLesbos) June 30, 2026
0 Comments
Stop Transing Gay Kids!
0 Comments
Battle Lines
Gay community and gay rights activism/politics were once intricately bound together. Now, what passes for gay community and LGBTQ+ activism/politics seem to be worlds apart, although many older gay men still heavily fund LGBTQ+ activist organizations, apparently unaware of the agenda these groups now support, such as transing gender-nonconforming gay and proto-gay kids and putting physically intact males who self-identify as female into girl’s and women’s locker rooms and sports.
From the Down Under, “Battle Lines Drawn as Gay, Trans Camps Square Off.”
But trans vs. gay may be the future generally. Via LGB Alliance Australia:
“Let’s be clear. ‘LGBTQIA+ no longer represents us. It now encompasses institutions that oppose the rights of lesbians, gay man and bisexual people, erasing our language, distorting our reality and mischaracterizing our rights as hate.”
0 Comments
And On It Goes …
And on and on …
There have been many scandals through the history of modern medicine. But none even come close to "gender-affirming care."
— Mia Hughes (@_CryMiaRiver) April 25, 2026
Think about it: A political movement just conjured into existence a type of young person that defies every single thing known about child and adolescent… pic.twitter.com/DOEGhPXmYd
True, not all trans kids detransition (so far), but that doesn’t justify the continuing unfairness of allowing bio males who identify as female to compete in girls’ and women’s sports. Or, as below, pretending that a female who competes on the women’s team is a male!:
Rorschach test.
— Leor Sapir (@LeorSapir) May 6, 2026
For believers in “gender identity,” this is the story of a unique type of man who bravely smashes barriers in an oppressive society.
For non-believers, it’s a story about a woman who makes it into a women’s soccer team. pic.twitter.com/1JN3nrCJh9
0 Comments
May the Truth Set Them Free
A new Finnish report on the aftermath of medical transitioning of minors and young adults is making waves. Here, from Any Ngo:
A new academic study published in Acta Paediatrica followed over 2,000 trans teens and young people who received “gender-affirming” care.
After treatment, mental health problems became more common, not less, and these trans people remained several times more likely to need psychiatric care than their non-trans peers. Psychiatric morbidity surged especially among those who transitioned medically through surgeries and/or cross-sex hormones.
The study’s findings are part of a growing body of research showing no improvements or even worse outcomes for people who transition, contradicting the claims from the ACLU, GLAAD, and leftist trans activists.
A new academic study published in Acta Paediatrica followed over 2,000 trans teens and young people who received "gender-affirming" care.
— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) April 7, 2026
After treatment, mental health problems became more common, not less, and these trans people remained several times more likely to need…
Rich Guggenheim points out that:
Finland has some of the best national health records in the world. Every specialist psychiatric visit, diagnosis, medication purchase, and procedure is logged. There is no loss to follow up. Researchers followed these young people for an average of 5.5 years after their first clinic visit (up to 25 years for the earliest cases).
Guggenheim adds:
Major LGBTIQA+ organizations have abandoned their original mission. Groups like GLAAD, Human Rights Campaign, and GLSEN once fought for basic rights for gays and lesbians: decriminalization, marriage equality, and protection from discrimination. Today they have shifted almost entirely to pragmatic outreach that targets children and pushes the radical trans queer agenda.
Plus:
The entire basis for medically "transitioning" minors was that this was the only way to relieve their "distress," said to be "gender dysphoria." If we didn't give them these hormones and surgeries they would suffer from mental health struggles for life and probably kill… https://t.co/xEFEdCQf3k
— Meghan Murphy (@MeghanEMurphy) April 8, 2026
And what the truth is up against:
And this:
Here’s my latest at Substack: May the Truth About Trans Treatments for Kids Set Them Free:
Call it “medical gender reassignment,” “sex-trait-altering procedures,” or “transgender medical interventions.” Just don’t call it “gender-affirming care.”
0 Comments
Supreme Court Punts on ‘Conversion Therapy’
Combining “change therapies” targeting sexual orientation and gender identity under the same rubric is one of the worst consequences of replacing the lesbian and gay rights movement with LGBTQ+.
Other views:
I agree as far as sexuality and particularly any form of physical therapy or electro-shock or anything like that.
— Brad Polumbo 🇺🇸⚽️ (@brad_polumbo) April 1, 2026
But they literally defined a therapist correctly telling a confused child what sex they are as "conversion therapy."
That's obviously insane, and, as far as talk… https://t.co/nRHSzSBRNu
As I’ve said, if Trump wants to allow therapists to help kids with gender confusion realize they can be a gender-nonconforming boy or girl, then “progressives” want to outlaw such counseling and only allow puberty blockers and breast/genital surgery as state-permitted treatment options.
“The Supreme Court did not ‘bring back gay conversion therapy.’ Coercive conversion therapy is still widely considered harmful and is not what this ruling was about.
— Peter 🇺🇸 (@monkieboy99) April 1, 2026
The case was about whether the government can restrict what licensed therapists are allowed to say in counseling… pic.twitter.com/1DYFez37oe