Progressive Dismiss History in Favor of Preferred Narratives
James Kirchick writes:
The role of [Frank] Kameny and other gay rights pioneers has been neglected by many historians, journalists, and cultural influencers, who prefer to locate the origins of the movement for gay equality in “a race riot against the police started by hustling transwomen of color.” They speak of the “privilege” supposedly enjoyed by Kameny and the other gay white men who dominated the pre-Stonewall gay rights movement, as if being a homosexual in mid-century America — hunted by the police, purged by the government, confined to mental institutions, and subjected to barbaric forms of medicalized torture — was a blessed way of life. That the movement’s intellectual roots are reformist and bourgeois does not suit these people’s ideological commitments or theory of history.
James Kirchick writes that the history of the gay rights movement has been distorted by progressives because noting the movement’s intellectual roots are reformist and bourgeois “does not suit these people’s ideological commitments or theory of history.” https://t.co/fwhqVOiyK6— CultureWatch (@IndeGayForum) July 1, 2022
Adam Zivo on the "emerging 'woke homophobia' that denigrates gay men and attempts to minimize their role in LGBTQ history. https://t.co/ekY7xvJ8D8— CultureWatch (@IndeGayForum) June 25, 2022
The Left, which now includes LGBTQ activists allied with BLM and the Democratic Party’s assurgent progressive wing, has embarked on a path to upturn all that is old and corrupt. This usually doesn’t end well. The American republic, built on a foundation of representative democracy and competing powers, fueled by freedom of speech treated as a sacred right, is less than 250 years old—a baby, still—and the fact that we assume it could not be toppled and replaced by a very different order is extremely naive.
As Pride Month draws to a close, the re-mything of Stonewall is ubiquitious. Some are trying to replace a false narrative with something more akin to the truth. As much as Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera are part of the story, rewriting their roles in an exercise of historical revisionism robs those who first rose up to fight back of their rightful place in history. But there are no statues, street names, children’s books or Google search page doodles for Marty Robinson and Morty Manford.
Historian Eric Marcus, writing in 1999:
The story of what really happened at Stonewall has yet to be distorted and embellished beyond the point of recognition, but it’s well on its way. The myth gets a boost every time someone writes about how “heroic drag queens started a riot at the Stonewall Inn, which marked the beginning of the gay rights movement.”
Now, of course, the gay-male drag queens have been transformed into transwomen. Gay guys, apparently, played only a secondary role in their own liberation, or so the narrative tells us.
Added, and recommended:
If Johnson and Rivera are to have a statue, contextualizing it in relation to Stonewall is clearly wrong, and the rush to turn the pair into trans rights icons seems to be doing the exact opposite of what the New York Times suggested – it’s erasing a pivotal event for gay men by making the dominant narrative transgenderism.
Much has been said lately about the problems of wantonly tearing down statues to erase history, but the ideology behind erecting statues to invented historical narratives might be even more alarming.
As old battles fade into history…
A generation of antagonists is passing away.
Sheldon was a protégé of Pat Robertson and fought against marriage equality and the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. https://t.co/w7sW8juOGI— The Advocate (@TheAdvocateMag) May 30, 2020
Then and Now
Echos of Another Plague
Covid is more infectious and less deadly than AIDS. It’s not a perfect comparison obviously. But my point about the psychological adaptation and continuing to live stands.— Jeff Giesea? (@jeffgiesea) April 9, 2020
Wear a mask is the new wear a condom. https://t.co/ncmkhcXNQ3 https://t.co/74dm25IoS7