Not as Predicted.

The Supreme Court, which we were told would become an anti-gay epicenter if Robertson and Alito were confirmed, has turned down a request from Jerry Falwell to close up Fallwell.com, a site that aims to explain "why Rev. Falwell is completely wrong about people who are gay or lesbian." The televangelist had claimed the domain name's spelling was too close to that of his official Web presence and asked the Court to shut it down. But apparently free speech is still seen as a constitutional right, in at least some instances.
-- Stephen H. Miller

Diversity Politics 1-2-3.

Diversity Politcs 1-A Smaller Tent. Gay state workers and job candidates have lost anti-discrimination protection as a result of an order that Kentucky Gov. Ernie Fletcher issued last week as part of the state's "Diversity Day." Fletcher replaced the 2003 employment policy of former Gov. Paul Patton with one that still bans employment discrimination because of "race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, veteran status and disability," but that deletes the earlier order's inclusion of sexual orientation (as well as gender identity). Several critics accused Fletcher, a Republican, of trying to exploit the issue to appeal to conservative voters. No kidding.

Fletcher's order came as he proclaimed in a speech to schoolchildren, "It is our diversity that gives us strength."

Diversity Politics 2-Who Is Pandering? The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force issued a report decrying efforts by "Republican leaders" to win black votes by appealing to "moral values," including opposition to gay marriage. That's a fair comment on the tactics of some (not all) socially conservative Republicans in the party's hierarchy.

But NGLTF then approvingly quotes the National Black Justice Coalition saying, "Poll taxes, literacy tests and lynching didn't stop us and I am confident we will prevail against this new tactic." Actually, it was southern Democrats/Dixiecrats that held high the banner of black exclusion, Jim Crow and segregation, but what matter facts when there is a bloody flag to be waved

Worse, NGLTF then claims that Republicans have voted against black interest by supporting Social Security reform (although private accounts would have been a better deal for blacks), and opposing affirmative action (race-based preferential treatment), raising the minimum wage (which makes it less likely underclass blacks will find entry-level jobs), federalizing education, and the budget-busting and all-round ill-conceived Medicaid expansion.

Wouldn't arguments showing that same-sex marriage is, in fact, "moral" have been more to the point?

Diversity Politics 3-Your Gay Dollars at Work. The irascible Jeff Gannon notes that the Human Rights Campaign both endorses and gives money to cop-bashing Ga. Rep Cynthia McKinney, now facing a tough primary fight against challenges who are both pro-gay and don't believe George Bush ordered that the planes be flown into the twin towers.

A Woman Warrior.

James Pinkerton asks:

What words does one use to describe the story of a Christian, lesbian, Air Force pilot-turned-journalist-turned-Katrina-relief-activist-a story with a distinctly faith-based, voluntaristic "thousand points of light" orientation?

The answer: Cholene Espinoza, of whom I first took note here when she caught the eye of Fox News.

But will the lesbigay political and media powers take note of a woman who emphasizes the importance of personal action and faith over fealty to big government in social problem-solving?

Our new site. Yes, we've launched (major kudos to IGF's volunteers!). Yes, there are some issues with older postings. We'll fix them. But I think it looks pretty cool. And you can now comment on the main articles as well-hey, you don't just have Steve Miller to kick around anymore!
-- Stephen H. Miller

Media and Speakers Service

Writing a news article on deadline?

Need a speaker for a panel discussion, talk show or local event?

The range of informed opinion out there is a whole lot more diverse and interesting than you'd guess from the "official" debate between entrenched pro- and anti-gay factions. At IGF, we've heard every possible variation on the theme: "I didn't know gays were allowed to believe that!" Or its flip side: "I didn't people who believed in [X, Y, Z] were allowed to be pro-gay too."

IGF's Press and Speakers Service can serve as a matchmaker for reporters and community groups in search of unexpected quotes and non-obvious takes on current events.

Need someone to talk intelligently about the "gay angle" in GOP politics or the turmoil in American religion? Sodomy-law repeal or the Second Amendment? Hate-crime laws or school choice? Trends in academia or censorship of the Internet? We can put you in touch with IGF contributing writers with appropriate expertise and other experts and authorities you'll find worth listening to. We can also point you toward some of the ever-growing list of straight conservative commentators who think it's past time for their colleagues to lay off the anti-gay demagoguery already.

For community and academic groups arranging speaker events and roundtables, IGF can put you in touch with a growing network of experienced public speakers based in several cities, as well as peripatetic authors (sometimes on book tour, sometimes not).

Interested?

Contact IGF's Press and Speakers Service for more information:

Media inquiries

Speaker inquiries

So Uncool.

Blogger Queer Beacon takes issue with the use of "gay" as a putdown, now ubiquitous among the high school set and even defended by Details magazine. But doesn't abandoning "gay" for "queer" play into all this?

More. A Google search shows that bloggers Jane Genova and Johnny have also taken issue with Details (but the actual style piece by "Dominick Wimple" isn't online).

History, or Gay History?

Over at Positive Liberty, Jonathan Rowe is perturbed by a new California bill requiring "schools to buy textbooks 'accurately' portraying 'the sexual diversity of our society." He thinks it smells of PC ghettoizing and fears adding gays to the list of minorities who get their own special little corners of discussion as the solution of least resistance.

As Rowe argues, yes, we should talk about who is gay in history. But no, clearly gays don't need any "special attention" given the disproportionate accomplishments that gays and bisexuals have made. Just teach history and honestly mention who is gay.

About Us

Forging a Gay Mainstream

The Independent Gay Forum has been created by a group of gay writers, academics, attorneys, and activists who feel dissatisfied with the current level of discussion of gay-related issues.

  • We support the full inclusion of gays and lesbians in civil society with legal equality and equal social respect. We argue that gays and lesbians, in turn, contribute to the creativity, robustness, and decency of our national life.
  • We share a belief in the fundamental virtues of the American system and its traditions of individual liberty, personal moral autonomy and responsibility, and equality before the law. We believe those traditions depend on the institutions of a market economy, free discussion, and limited government.
  • We deny "conservative" claims that gays and lesbians pose any threat to social morality or the political order.
  • We equally oppose "progressive" claims that gays should support radical social change or restructuring of society.
  • We share an approach, but we disagree on many particulars. We include libertarians, limited-government conservatives, moderates, and classical liberals. We hold differing views on the role of government, personal morality, religious faith, and personal relationships. We share these disagreements openly: we hope that readers will find them interesting and thought-provoking.

IGF is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation. It serves as a forum for debate and discussion and does not take positions on matters of politics or policy. The views expressed are those of the authors alone.

If you have an article that you think belongs here, we'd like to hear from you. But please bear in mind that, because we lack editorial and legal staff, articles must have been previously published in an edited journal, whether print or online. All articles published here are reprinted by permission, with copyright retained by author or original publisher.

The Editors

Staff

Meet our staff and contributing writers.

Media

Learn about our media coordinator and speakers bureau.

Update on Our Updates.

Several new pieces are now posted, covering important global themes, the ongoing polygamy debate, and Dale Carpenter's look at why Catholic charities should be allowed to discriminate. Carpenter remarks, provocatively (but insightfully):

While gay advocates may strongly disagree with church doctrine, there's no basis for saying that the Catholic Church's objections to gay adoptions have "nothing whatsoever to do with faith." Exempting Catholic Charities would serve the higher purpose: of respecting the deep religious convictions of a major faith tradition, without hurting children or appreciably affecting the adoption prospects of gay parents.

But hey, there's no fundraising fire in that accommodation.

By the way, our new site redesign is now in the final stages of being tweaked (with a good deal of volunteer labor). We hope to launch in just another month or so. Thanks again to all those who are, through their generous support, helping us to bring this about.

A Bigger Tent.

In my posting yesterday (below), I remarked on Fox News interviewing an out lesbian (and former U.S. Air Force pilot) on the need for individuals to take responsibility for helping Katrina victims instead of expecting big daddy government to make everything right.

Now, today, the Wall Street Journal's conservative OpinionJournal/Best of the Web approvingly cites Gay Patriot for his observations on "the Orwellian worldview of Bush-haters."

The issue here is not whether you agree with Ms. Espinoza or Mr. Patriot (a point some commenters missed). It's that conservative mainstream media and conservatives in general (excluding the hardcore social/religious right) are less bigoted than the gay left imagines.

There are openings here for gay conservatives to work with straight conservatives on issues of mutual concern, which could do a great deal to break down the misinformation and stereotypes that feed opposition to gay legal equality.