Politics & Public Opinion
Identity Politics In, Class Consciousness Out
Joshua Mitchell writes::
“Identity politics rejects the model of traditional give-and-take politics, presupposing instead that the most important thing about us is that we are white, black, male, female, straight, gay, and so on. Within the identity-politics world, we do not need to give reasons—identity is its own reason and justification. Because identity politics supposes that we are our identities, politics does not consist in the speech, argument, and persuasion of normal politics but instead, in the calculation of resource redistribution based on identity—what in Democratic parlance is called “social justice.” … What speech does attend this post-political age consists in shaming those who do not accept the idea of identity politics—as on our college campuses. In the 1960s, college students across the country fought so that repressed ideas would receive a fair hearing. These days, college students fight to repress all ideas except one: identity politics.”
He also observes:
“Once, the Democrats were the party of the middle class, attentive to how it might be lifted up—or at least, kept from falling. But during the 2016 election, the Democrats offered the middle class nothing—Americans counted only insofar as they belonged to this or that identity group. And when the Democrats lost, they blamed white members of the middle class who voted for Trump and who had had enough of identity politics.”
1 Comment
Marching in Lock Step
Organizers ban gay Trump supporters from North Carolina pride parade. Diversity!
And Scott Shackford writes:
Talbert has said he’s going to sue Charlotte Pride for discrimination, which is also a terrible response. Charlotte Pride should be allowed to include or exclude any participants it wants. It’s their parade. And there’s already a Supreme Court decision that affirms that parade organizers have the right to exclude participants with messages they do not support.
But Charlotte Pride’s organizers should remember something. That Supreme Court case was about a very long fight by LGBT groups to be included in St. Patrick’s Day parades. And they’re only just now, in this decade, convincing the Catholic organizers of those events to allow them in. To turn around and treat another group of gay people the same way is pretty terrible.
Meanwhile…
No doubt more “pinkwashing,” progressives will declare:
Over 200,000 attend #TelAviv #LGBT Pride Parade, some 30,000 from abroad https://t.co/UNdT5G7EFj @PrideToronto #PrideTO #Canqueer
— Joseph Adams (@josephintoronto) June 10, 2017
Los Angeles Pride Parade becomes Resist March—to foster inclusion.
L.A. Pride Parade replaced by "Resist' March. https://t.co/yO1H2m8RGc
— IGF CultureWatch (@IndeGayForum) June 10, 2017
8 Comments
That’s Not Funny!
LGBTQ hypersensitivities have played a major role, after race and gender, in the intersectional hysteria that has gripped college campuses and, indeed, much of the left. Does growing mockery signal that sanity may be returning? If so, is there a path toward equality and supportive community that doesn’t invoke authoritarian-like thought control and the demonizing of white, heterosexual, cisgender males?
—
Really not so funny:
More. Via Heterodox Academy: “In the wake of the violence at Middlebury and Berkeley…many commentators have begun analyzing the new campus culture of intersectionality as a form of fundamentalist religion including public rituals with more than a passing resemblance to witch-hunts.”
10 Comments
Pride Month Approaches
June is Pride Month, and various cities and locales are facing a new wave of politically correct deplatforming and exclusion protests.
In Washington, D.C., organizers of D.C.’s annual Capital Pride Parade and Festival were pressed by a group called No Justice No Pride to ban police officers and corporate sponsors from the annual pride parade and events. The organizers stood their ground.
DC Pride and the Equality March is under attack – https://t.co/jNJhfdMl1R #LGBT #gay #Pride
— Back2Stonewall.com (@BACK2STONEWALL) April 29, 2017
OPINION | Police, corporate sponsors must be welcome at Pride https://t.co/7K41cFKAdO
— Washington Blade (@WashBlade) May 4, 2017
In Toronto, organizers went the other way and banned LGBT police from participating in their pride events, capitulating to Black Lives Matter activists.
Shocking that @PrideToronto still purports to be inclusive despite banning #LGBT police from marching/having booth at #PrideTO. #TOpoli https://t.co/Q1TDBdZxBr
— Joseph Adams (@josephintoronto) April 29, 2017
As Pride Month nears, I remember how it felt to walk proudly in uniform – with my partner and fellow members. @PrideToronto @TDotGayCops pic.twitter.com/Azt00idBx2
— K. Ashley (@kcashley_1987) April 28, 2017
D.C.’s Capital Pride did remove a volunteer event producer for expressing views they deemed offensive. Bryan Pruitt had posted an article last year at the conservative blog RedState that said government decrees and legislation regarding transgender bathroom use sought “to implement a solution in search of a problem. The City of Charlotte passes an unnecessary law and the State Legislature provides an equally overreaching response.”
On that point, if not on others, I would agree, so I guess my volunteer services would also be unwelcome.
Capital Pride volunteer ousted over trans remark https://t.co/Xrua9lq7P1
— Washington Blade (@WashBlade) April 30, 2017
And the demands keep coming….
NEW at @WashBlade:
Small Gang of #LGBT #Pride Critics Stink of 'Privilege' –#NoJusticeNoPride Seeks to Hijack Eventhttps://t.co/lgwny2EAMy— Mark Lee (@MarkLeeDC) May 12, 2017
7 Comments
The Trump Divide
Log Cabin makes its case:
LGBT rights leaders flunk Trump on first 100 dayshttps://t.co/o0zzpuqQCK pic.twitter.com/YNdMC46POi
— DCHomos (@DCHomos) April 27, 2017
Trump can be criticized on many grounds but all those “F”s from LGBT activist “leaders” is pure partisan progressive hackery.
Plus this charming cover.

And widespread disdain for both parties—by those who identify as party supporters:
COLUMN | Voters Learn There's Little to Love About Either Party
>@WashBlade:https://t.co/QzvvrDK7rS— Mark Lee (@MarkLeeDC) April 28, 2017
Finally, Andrew Sullivan detests Trump but makes some pertinent observations.
Trump’s first 100 days have proven that the Constitution can, so far, keep his worst impulses in check https://t.co/5IhHsxEBCr
— Daily Intelligencer (@intelligencer) April 28, 2017
66 Comments
Competing Headlines
Take One
Anti-LGBT adoption bill sent to South Dakota governor. (State law allows adoption agencies to discriminate against same-sex couples.)
Liberals Call SD Religious Freedom Adoption Law ‘Anti-LGBT’. (State law allows religious nonprofits to follow principles of their faith.)
Honorable Mention:
LGBTQ Advocates Fear ‘Religious Freedom’ Bills Moving Forward in States. (Count on NPR online to use scare quotes around a pivotal constitutional right that’s out of favor on the left.)
Take Two
Amid Dramatic Cuts, HIV/AIDS Funding Spared in New Trump Budget. (Despite our best efforts, we really couldn’t spin this as anti-LGBT; a source does say “What’s unknown is how this might affect a whole range of other programs that provide HIV support.”)
GOP health plan’s ‘devastating’ impact on those with HIV. (One way or another, Trump will imperil the HIV-positive.)
Honorable Mention:
Trump budget slashes State Department, USAID funding. (One of the revolving marquee headlines this weekend at Washington Blade online, apparently for no reason other than AID at first glances looks like AIDS.)
32 Comments
Milo (Yawn)
I haven’t commented on the uproar over Milos Yiannopoulos because he and the circus around him bore me.
Milo brouhaha exposes conservative fault lines. https://t.co/egRos9oqju
— IGF CultureWatch (@IndeGayForum) February 23, 2017
He has his defenders—”Milo is indisputably the most effective conservative on campus battling the anti-American identity-obsessed, racist Left,” writes David Horowitz. But Yiannopoulos has always been a provocateur who muddied the good fight against politically correct attacks on free speech (both formal and mob-driven) on college campuses and elsewhere with his own bigotries. Whatever good—and there was some—that came from an openly gay man becoming a major figure respected within the Breitbart crowd was undercut by his playing footsie with the alt right (a loose movement whose size and power are mendaciously exaggerated by the left, but which does exist).
His downfall over previous comments seeming to make light of pedophilia, including his own abuse by a priest, have now resulted in his leaving Breitbart News and being disinvited from the upcoming Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), where he was to be a keynote speaker, all of which is to the delight of the alt-left.
Perhaps the circus has now left town.
More. CPAC is minus Milo, but the Log Cabin Republicans, once excluded, again have a booth.
Ready to roll at #CPAC2017! Find us at Booth #328 in the CPAC Hub to get an official LCR sticker and LGBT conservative swag! pic.twitter.com/lbQ2wy4iui
— LogCabinRepublicans (@LogCabinGOP) February 23, 2017
17 Comments
When nonprogresives support LGBT rights, it’s insidious
The Trump administration will keep the position of special U.S. envoy to promote LGBT rights abroad at State Department, the Washington Blade reports.
Trump administration to keep position of special U.S. envoy to promote LGBT rights abroad at State Department. https://t.co/jS4hRF0Gr0
— IGF CultureWatch (@IndeGayForum) February 18, 2017
Pete Buttigieg, gay mayor of South Bend, Ind., with higher political aspirations (he’s an extremely long-shock candidate for Democratic National Committee Chair), in a separate Washington Blade interview, lambasted “the level of ‘pinkwashing’ of the Trump campaign.”
Reminder: The term “pinkwashing” was concocted by leftists to dismiss Israel’s support for gay legal equality and inclusion. As described by Mark Joseph Stern, it’s the presumption that “the Israeli government has no interest in promoting LGBTQ rights except to help mask its oppression of other groups.” That Buttigieg would use such a term is, well, disgraceful.
4 Comments
Challenging the Narrative
Two tweets:
LGBT progressives' attempts to portray Judge Gorsuch as a homophobe are running into resistance. https://t.co/yO74kWUYpi
— IGF CultureWatch (@IndeGayForum) February 12, 2017
(Compare the above with the hyperbolic Washington Blade headline ‘Scalia on Steroids’, quoting NYC Rep. Jerry Nadler’s characterization of the judge.)
"If you dare to…make an effort toward understanding why conservatives think the way they do, you are a traitor." https://t.co/NFhIiuvG5S
— IGF CultureWatch (@IndeGayForum) February 12, 2017