Pink, Maybe. But Still Red.

Over the past few years, the government of Cuba has earned praise for an unlikely development: a campaign to improve the status of the island's gays. Standing at the forefront of this effort has been an even unlikelier figure: Mariela Castro Espín, the daughter of Raul Castro, who officially assumed the Cuban presidency last year after his brother Fidel fell ill. The latest entry in this narrative was a largely laudatory profile of Espín in The Advocate, which described her as a "champion" of the island's "gay and transgender community." Espín is director of the Cuban National Center for Sex Education, an organization which, according to its website, promotes "the development of a culture of sexuality that is full, pleasurable, and responsible, as well as to promote the full exercise of sexual rights."

Like most Latin American countries, Cuba has long been marked by regressive policies concerning homosexuality, due largely to a machismo culture that promotes a heroic masculinity portraying gays as weak and ill-suited to positions of leadership, whether in home or government. As Espín herself says, "Homophobia in Cuba is part of what makes you a 'man.'" But while Espín should be praised for her attempt to change Cuban attitudes about homosexuality, her advocacy in this realm ought not disabuse anyone of the fact that she is part and parcel of the architecture of repression that has governed the island for five painful decades.

Whatever pleasant sounding pieties she mouths about the dignity of gay people, Espín is a communist, an appellation that ought carry no less opprobrium today than it did before the fall of the Berlin Wall. In Castro's Cuba it's still 1956, the year Soviet tanks crushed a peaceful democratic uprising in Hungary, one of the Cold War's darkest moments. Cuba remains the most repressive country in the Western hemisphere; Freedom House, the international human rights monitoring organization, lists it as the only "unfree" nation in the region (on a scale of one to seven - seven being the worst - Cuba earns a seven for political rights and six for civil liberties). The time warp is evident in a more literal sense: the few cars you'll see on the streets are decades old, except, of course, the late-model Mercedes that chauffeur around the island's elite.

It may seem strange that, in this day and age, one still has to mount a case against communism, but as long as a prominent member of the family that has ruled Cuba without interruption for 50 years is the subject of a flattering profile in a major publication, the work remains sadly necessary.

As a political system, communism has killed some 100 million people, according to The Black Book of Communism, a number that increases each day the North Korean slave state continues unabated. Castro's Cuba is responsible for a relatively minor portion of those victims, but that's only because "el jefe" has had just a small island's worth of people to oppress, imprison, and murder. And Castro's treatment of gays is particularly notorious: Not long after taking power, his regime herded thousands of gay men into concentration camps for "reeducation," where they were subjected to sexual humiliation and forced labor and were murdered en masse. In 1980, gay Cubans were among the 125,000 people - "scum," in the words of the Cuban government - whom Castro allowed to leave for U.S. shores in the famous Mariel Boatlift. To underscore what he thought of gay people, Castro made sure that an ample number of violent convicts and patients from mental asylums joined the departing masses.

As she related to The Advocate and elsewhere, Espín remains a fervent proponent of the "revolution" which has wreaked so much misery and poverty on Cuba, and she thus carries all of the malicious baggage that such an avowal entails. She says that her uncle is a "brilliant man." Considered the "first lady" of Cuba, she recently told a Russian government-controlled television station that "Cuba will stay socialist after Castro's death." She told The Advocate that, despite her "faith and hopes" in President Barack Obama, "he has shown no real democratic outreach to Cuba." On top of this, she patronized the American people by saying how "proud" she was of the "miracle brought about by" their electing "a young, intelligent black man." If only she cared for democracy and racial tolerance in her own nation, where there has never been an election, and where people of African descent face systematic and rampant discrimination by the government.

Moreover, Espín's activism is largely hype, and mostly the product of people who have a vested interested in putting a pleasant face on a despicable regime. For true believers, Cuba is the last bastion of an utterly discredited political and economic system. But with gay equality now a component of the "progressive" agenda, it has become painfully necessary to portray the Cuban regime as gay-friendly.

Yet it's difficult to point to any tangible benefits that Espín's activism has accrued, other than a decision last year by the Cuban government to dispense free sex-reassignment surgeries. This is a policy of dubious merit that affects an infinitesimally small number of people, and is better understood as a propaganda tool rather than a genuine sign of concern for the plight of gays. This is the sort of thing that's fodder for those who think that our health care system should emulate that of an island prison.

But no matter how genuine or fervent her promotion of gay rights may be, Espín's activism will ultimately go nowhere as long as Cuba remains communist. And that's because homophobia has been intrinsic to communism, which, like all totalitarian ideologies, seeks to perfect mankind, often through violent means. Doctrinaire communists view homosexuality as a bourgeois affliction standing in the way of our "progress" towards a utopian society in which there is no private property, war, or discord and all responsibilities are equally shared. Same-sex attraction is held as an expression of the "false consciousness" that distracts us from the class struggle.

Like Sean Penn, who has also emerged of late as a self-styled advocate for gay rights, Mariela Castro Espín has a serious blind spot. It is the failure, so pervasive and persistent throughout human history, to understand that no political system - regardless of how wonderful in theory or the marvelous claims it makes for itself - can be considered humane as long as it inherently denies fundamental rights like freedom of conscience and speech, the ability to practice religion, vote for one's leaders, and earn a living commensurate with one's talents and abilities.

"Being considered a lesbian would not be an insult to me," Espín told The Advocate. "Being considered corrupt would be." Her first concern is of but prurient interest. As for her second, by proudly embracing a moral stain as a badge of honor, it's far too late. Gay rights are human rights, and if one is not an advocate for human rights, as Mariela Castro is most certainly not, one cannot be an advocate for gay rights, no matter how well disposed toward gay and lesbian people one may be.

Let's posit, for the sake of argument, that Cuban gays truly earned equal rights. No doubt the Cuban regime's apologists would point to its supposedly "progressive" attitude, contrasting it favorably to the Christian yahoos who run the United States. But even if Cuba legalized gay marriage tomorrow - a highly dubious prospect - it would still be a dictatorship. No matter the degree to which the status of homosexuals in Cuba improves under the communist regime, Cuban gays - like Cuban straights - would still be thrown into prison for daring to tell an anti-Castro joke. They still would not be able to organize peaceful demonstrations against government policies, never mind vote in a free election. More fundamentally, they still would not be able to leave the island of their own volition.

What sort of freedom is this?

5 Comments for “Pink, Maybe. But Still Red.”

  1. posted by HT on

    It’s so hard to know who one’s allies and enemies are. Western Christendom has long been the land of liberty, enlightenment, and plenty, while its envious rivals pratfall all over themselves simultaneously trying to emulate, mock, and demonize its success. And to be fair, Western Christendom has long swept its own sins under the rug. Consider what we did to the Cubans! For many years, our own state’s interventionism caused plenty of damage in and of itself, and worse yet greatly strengthened the impression Cuba’s system is not failing on its own merits but due to outsider sabotage.

  2. posted by Gustavo Gonçalves on

    I think it is ridiculous to “accuse” that “most” of Latin American countries have a backgroung history of anti-gay policies due to “machismo”. I don’t know about Mexico, but I assure you that in Brazil (I’m Brazilian) and Argentina, for example, there has never been an anti-gay law! Another day I was reserching about homophobia in Cuba, and there was this article “accusing” the Holy Catholic Church as the guilty of the machismo in Cuba! Ridiculous.

    Well, I’m a member of a conservative homossexual catholics organization here in Brazil (you can acess the blog, but it is in Portuguese) and I have a contact inside Cuba, who is also a member of the “Reinaldo Arenas LGBT Foundation”. Every single week, this courageous man have been reporting to us despicable cases of crimes and disrespect to human rights against gays. Cases like expelting students from college for being gays, arresting lesbians for dating at the Playa del Chivo beach in Habana, and much more. According to him, there is NO HOMOSSEXUAL CUBAN who feels that Mariela Castro represents them at all. All her “work”, according to them, are nothing more than pure propaganda, because, in reality, nothing as changed to them! Gays still are being arrested!

    Think about it. Why would Mariela bothers to prepare an propaganda for illuding homosexuals? The only reason I see, is that they, as communists, still believe that homosexual person are still good to perform in their plan

    to expand their revolution into the other countries. This is the case of the Brazilian President Lula da Silva, he has promised a lot and did not fullfil his promisses, and is also an socialist.

  3. posted by Bobby on

    Espin can say what she wants because she’s a Castro relative and she’s protected. I’m not impressed.

  4. posted by Last Of The Moderate Gays on

    Bravo, Mr. Kirchick, for reminding all of us that, for all of their supposed “progress,” Cuba remains a land ruled by a brutal, totalitarian, dictator (now Raul instead of Fidel). Left-wing Hollywood nitwits like Sean Penn, Oliver Stone, and the editors at the Advocate may overlook this, but this is still the same disgusting dictatorship, now with a cheap coat of pinkwash.

    And, thanks to Gustavo for providing some additional insight, as well.

  5. posted by Mark on

    Of course, Mr. Kirchick is fine with supporting pro-torture, pro-militarist, pro-war, anti-liberty semi- facists like Rudy Giulliani while smearing people like Ron Paul. It’s just a matter of degree between Rudy and the Castro regime. (And the Castros are very pro-abortion too.)

Comments are closed.