On the next-to-last night of Hanukkah I went to Alan and Will's
house, and before the menorah lighting there was time to read a
book with 4-year-old Sam. I had brought him Lemony Snicket's
The Latke Who Couldn't Stop Screaming, with a cover blurb,
"Latkes are potato pancakes served at Hanukkah. Lemony Snicket is
an alleged children's book author. For the first time in literary
history, these two elements are combined in one book." The latke
was screaming first because it had been thrown into a pan of
boiling oil, and then because everyone it ran into-a string of
colored lights, a candy cane, and a pine tree-tried to make it a
part of Christmas, when it had nothing to do with Christmas.
I know how the latke felt, because I keep coming across
fundamentalists who insist that everyone else's religion match
theirs. The latest source of annoyance is Republican presidential
candidates, most of whom are not fundamentalists but pander to them
for their support in upcoming state caucuses and primaries. One
contender in this dismal competition is Mitt Romney, who said on
Dec. 6, "Freedom requires religion."
With all due thanks, I feel free to say that the former
governor's statement is absolute rubbish. Organized religion has a
long, bloody history of being an enemy of freedom. Granted, it
depends on what the meaning of "freedom" is. Romney's version of
the First Amendment, like that of Democrat Joe Lieberman before
him, says that we are guaranteed freedom of religion, not freedom
from religion.
New York Times columnist David Brooks wrote on Dec. 7,
"In Romney's account, faith ends up as wishy-washy as the most New
Age-y secularism. In arguing that the faithful are brothers in a
common struggle, Romney insisted that all religions share an equal
devotion to all good things. Really? Then why not choose the one
with the prettiest buildings?"
Then there is Rudy Giuliani, who said on NBC's Meet the
Press on Dec. 9, "My moral views on this come from ... the
Catholic Church, and I believe that homosexuality, heterosexuality,
as a way that somebody leads their life ... isn't sinful. It's the
acts-it's the various acts that people perform that are sinful, not
the orientation that they have. I've had my own sins that I've had
to confess." This echoes the phony fundie distinction between sin
and sinner, and shows how far Rudy has drifted since living with a
gay couple for a time while mayor of New York. It was smart of him
to mention his own sinfulness, since he did not obtain an annulment
of his second marriage as he had for his first; but his church
offers gay people no option but lifelong celibacy.
Finally there is Mike Huckabee, who wrote as a U.S. Senate
candidate in 1992, "I feel homosexuality is an aberrant, unnatural,
and sinful lifestyle, and we now know it can pose a dangerous
public health risk." As a reader commented on Politico.com on Dec.
8, "I feel gluttony is an aberrant, unnatural, and sinful
lifestyle, and we now know it can pose a dangerous public health
risk. Good thing Huckabee went on a diet before his presidential
run." Huckabee also called for the isolation of people with HIV in
1992, long after it was learned that HIV was not easily
communicable like airborne diseases. But to be fair, in contrast to
Romney and Giuliani, Huckabee's ignorance appears genuine.
The GOP candidate follies are the Bush-Rove strategy come home
to roost. The desperation and disconnect of the religious right's
war on popular culture is illustrated by recent attacks against
The Golden Compass, a movie based on the first volume of
Philip Pullman's fantasy trilogy, His Dark Materials.
Catholic League president Bill Donahue states, "This is pernicious.
This is selling atheism to kids, and it's doing it in a backdoor
fashion." Considering Donahue's assertions that the sexual abuse of
children by priests was not done by pedophiles but by homosexuals,
he knows all about backdoor attacks.
That fantasy literature can provoke such fury from the religious
bullies shows their fear of the imagination-which is fear of
freedom. Pullman responded on Nov. 2, "I prefer to trust the
reader.... As for the atheism, it doesn't matter to me whether
people believe in God or not, so I'm not promoting anything of that
sort. What I do care about is whether people are cruel or whether
they're kind, whether they act for democracy or for tyranny,
whether they believe in open-minded enquiry or in shutting the
freedom of thought and expression."
We should not let exasperation at right-wing excesses prompt us
to throw out the religious baby with the fundamentalist bathwater.
For one thing, champions of liberty ought to show more tolerance
than the fundies. For another, many secularists are religious. I
was reminded of this on Dec. 6 at the home of Pastor John Wimberly
of DC's Western Presbyterian Church, who hosted an ACLU discussion
of liberty and security. When we accept the theocrats'
characterization of secularism as hatred of religion, we concede
more than they deserve.
At Alan and Will's, after Sam finished his dinner, he went
around the table for hugs. "Good night, Uncle Ricky," he said,
kissing me on the cheek. Then Will took him upstairs and read him
another story unapproved by the Catholic League. And Daddy's little
miracle was just fine.