IGF CultureWatch

"Bigotry is bad for business," said Alan Hawse, vice president of information technology company Cypress Semiconductor, in remarks directed at anti-gay Gov. Ernie Fletcher of Kentucky. But I've long felt that many (most) politicos in both parties aren't primarily concerned with the general well being. Their energy is focused on themselves and the maximization of their own position and power, and so appeals to bigotry, however hurtful of economic growth, prosperity and dynamism, thus serve their primary interest.

This is evident on the left, too, with anti-globalization and pro-protectionism. Simply terrible policies, economically speaking, that nevertheless appeal to the fears and prejudices of the uninformed.

And as for some religious "leaders" organizing in favor of constitutionally banning same-sex marriage, I can only quote the Bible: "Alas for you, lawyers and Pharisees, hypocrites that ye be."

And let's not forgot our very own gay "leaders." In the Times story linked above, catch the quote from HRC's clueless Joe Solmonese, who intones that the amendment is an unwanted distraction when (among other things) "we have an economy barely hanging on." Apparently, he agrees with John Kerry that this is the worst economy since the Great Depression, but most Americans see low unemployment, moderate if slowly rising interest rates, low inflation (excepting gas), very solid economic growth and an up stock market as, well, not "barely hanging on."

More. Some commenters defend the Kerry/Solmonese/Democratic "talking points" line on the economy, but even the New York Times business section can't abide it. An April 28 report was headlined "U.S. Economic Growth Continues Its Rapid Pace; Consumers Are Upbeat," while a companion story reported that "With unemployment in March at 4.7 percent, the nation is still adding about 200,000 jobs a month-a fairly robust pace."
-- Stephen H. Miller

The Houston Voice reports (scroll down) that in Saskatchewan, Canada, gay activists are worried about "gay bashing" following a decision by the province's highest court:

The complaint pitted religious freedom of expression against the rights of gays to protection against hatred and ridicule. On April 13, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeals ruled Hugh Owns did not violate the Human Rights Code when he placed an ad in the Star-Phoenix in June 1997 that reflected his anti-gay views. The ad cited the Bible verses condemning homosexuality.

And here's how one of the gay activists responded:

"Im very disappointed," said Gens Hellquist, one of three Saskatoon gay activists who initiated [the] human rights complaint against [Owen].

Could there be a better example of how illiberal and censorious some activists are? And of course, the Christian right is making hay of it all. As the Mission News Network puts it (again, scroll down):

It is debatable whether Mr. Owen's ads were an appropriate means of communicating the Biblical teaching on homosexuality. What makes the [earlier, now overturned] Saskatchewan ruling so disturbing, however, is that the adjudicator, Ms. Watson, concluded that it was the Bible verses that pushed the advertisement over the line that separates questionable judgement from intolerance.

The Christian rightists couldn't have hoped for a better example to buttress their own claim of being the party that's victimized (by gays).

Relatedly. Beth Elliot weighs a 9th Circuit Court of Appeal decision upholding the high school disciplinary action against a senior who wore "a snarky, gay-dissing t-shirt." On this, I'd agree that freedom of expression for students on school grounds is expected to be restricted, to a degree.

Still more. Hans Bader of the Competitive Enterprise Institute says "no one has a right not to be offended." But James Taranto of the WSJ writes (scroll down):

This is one of those situations in which everyone involved is wrong. The school should have concentrated on reading, math and the like and not gotten involved in issues of sexual orientation. If Harper insisted on protesting, he should have done so in a less obnoxious way. When he failed to do so, school officials should have shown some tolerance and let it go.

The U.S. Supreme Court should not have ruled, in Tinker v. Des Moines School District (1969), that minors have a First Amendment right to engage in political speech at school. But since that is the law, the Ninth Circuit should not have carved out an exception for, as Judge Stephen Reinhardt put it, "speech that attacks high school students who are members of minority groups that have historically been oppressed, subjected to verbal and physical abuse, and made to feel inferior."

I agree that Tinker was one of those '60s "power to the students" rulings that led to constitutional contortions in matters such as restraining students from wearing offensive T-shirts to school. High school kids are not adults, and public schools are not public squares. But school choice would be a better option, giving parents more say in the sort of school envirnment (protective or permissive) their kids are suited for.
-- Stephen H. Miller

In the Bay Area Reporter, Bob Roehr pens an excellent account of how the Gill Action Fund is getting it right. Set up by Denver gay entrepreneur and philanthropist Tim Gill to support results-oriented gay activism on the local level, that's just what the fund is doing.

Ted Trimpa, who advises the fund, and Rodger McFarlane, executive director of the Gill Foundation, shared their insights with Roehr, who reported:

The foundation and action fund also have learned to play both sides of the political aisle. "Part of Tim's giving strategy on the Republican side has been, let's help Republicans take their party back, rather than change them into Democrats. There are reasons they are Republican, and we have to respect that," said Trimpa.

McFarlane adds in a conspiratorial whisper, "And many of us happen to agree" with some of those reasons.

That alone gives you a clue of why the foundation has been successful. As Roehr continues:

McFarlane has joined the growing chorus of those within the LGBT community calling for "actual legislative wins," and accountability. "In the past it was we've gotta elect a Democrat, we've gotta elect a Democrat. And the Democrats haven't done very well, nor have they responded to our adversaries."

"I think they're just scared of our issues. They're stuck [back] 10 years ago and think this is a negative, when in fact, if you look at the data and if you get on the offensive, it is not a negative," McFarlane said.

"Tim has said, passing money through the Democratic Party and letting someone speak for us has not worked. We always end up as the piece that is negotiable-we always fall off the end. Bill Clinton would make speeches that would inspire you to walk across the desert, and then every time we came to getting something out of committee or actually voting on something, we were the ones that were cut," McFarlane added.

And here's another "on the money" quote:

The pair criticizes much past political spending for piddling away money to support "friends" who are going to win anyway; many of whom may vote the right way but do not exercise leadership on LGBT issues. Trimpa said money has to be concentrated for maximum impact, both "to punish the evil," and "to create an environment where there is reward for people who actually lead, who take those risks."

Can't argue with that.
--Stephen H. Miller

Are drugstores that keep condoms behind the counter in high-crime areas enforcing "puritanism" in an attempt to "stigmatize safe sex"? Is this another sign of "America's terrifyingly conservative climate"? David Boaz says no.
-- Stephen H. Miller

The constitutional amendment to nationalize marriage law by forbidding states from recognizing same-sex matrimony (whether by judicial decree or legislative vote) won't win the necessary supermajority in the Senate this year. But the Republican leadership will likely bring it back before every election. That may be politically advantageous for now, at least in terms of keeping the GOP "base" of social conservatives well stoked. But as more Americans become more comfortable with spousal rights for gays, being on the side of reaction won't bode well for the party.

The conservative Washington Times reports that amendment supporters are courting "liberals," by which they mean African-American and Hispanic religious organizations typically on the left regarding wealth redistribution and big-government pork-barrel spending. That's called being "progressive" on the left. But it's in fact reactionary support for the dysfunctional status quo. Add in homophobia and you've got a very bad political mixture all round.

More. In the D.C. neighborhood of Shaw, African-American parishioners oppose allowing a gay bar to open near their Scripture Cathedral. "Don't they understand that there is a day-care center in the church?" asks one woman.
-- Stephen H. Miller

The Supreme Court, which we were told would become an anti-gay epicenter if Robertson and Alito were confirmed, has turned down a request from Jerry Falwell to close up Fallwell.com, a site that aims to explain "why Rev. Falwell is completely wrong about people who are gay or lesbian." The televangelist had claimed the domain name's spelling was too close to that of his official Web presence and asked the Court to shut it down. But apparently free speech is still seen as a constitutional right, in at least some instances.
-- Stephen H. Miller

As the Washington Blade reports, a new study by an associate of controversial researcher Michael Bailey claims, in Bailey-like fashion, that same-sex sexual orientation is an outgrowth of gender confusion at an early age. Other researchers dispute this as a causal factor, while still others find there may be an association in some instances but not enough to form a general rule. Confusion reigns; though many believe homosexuality is hard wired in the brain (pick your cause-genetics or hormones in the womb).

Interestingly, many simply ignore effeminate but clearly heterosexual men, and masculine but clearly heterosexual women. Such factors tend to mess up perfectly clear theorizing.
-- Stephen H. Miller

Gay families exercised their right to partake of the White House Easter Egg Roll, wearing rainbow leis to identify themselves. Given that this is a government-sponsored event, and the government in question hasn't shown much concern about the needs of gay families, I think the egg rollers scored some points in a positive way.
--Stephen H. Miller

James Pinkerton asks:

What words does one use to describe the story of a Christian, lesbian, Air Force pilot-turned-journalist-turned-Katrina-relief-activist-a story with a distinctly faith-based, voluntaristic "thousand points of light" orientation?

The answer: Cholene Espinoza, of whom I first took note here when she caught the eye of Fox News.

But will the lesbigay political and media powers take note of a woman who emphasizes the importance of personal action and faith over fealty to big government in social problem-solving?

Our new site. Yes, we've launched (major kudos to IGF's volunteers!). Yes, there are some issues with older postings. We'll fix them. But I think it looks pretty cool. And you can now comment on the main articles as well-hey, you don't just have Steve Miller to kick around anymore!
-- Stephen H. Miller

Diversity Politcs 1-A Smaller Tent. Gay state workers and job candidates have lost anti-discrimination protection as a result of an order that Kentucky Gov. Ernie Fletcher issued last week as part of the state's "Diversity Day." Fletcher replaced the 2003 employment policy of former Gov. Paul Patton with one that still bans employment discrimination because of "race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, veteran status and disability," but that deletes the earlier order's inclusion of sexual orientation (as well as gender identity). Several critics accused Fletcher, a Republican, of trying to exploit the issue to appeal to conservative voters. No kidding.

Fletcher's order came as he proclaimed in a speech to schoolchildren, "It is our diversity that gives us strength."

Diversity Politics 2-Who Is Pandering? The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force issued a report decrying efforts by "Republican leaders" to win black votes by appealing to "moral values," including opposition to gay marriage. That's a fair comment on the tactics of some (not all) socially conservative Republicans in the party's hierarchy.

But NGLTF then approvingly quotes the National Black Justice Coalition saying, "Poll taxes, literacy tests and lynching didn't stop us and I am confident we will prevail against this new tactic." Actually, it was southern Democrats/Dixiecrats that held high the banner of black exclusion, Jim Crow and segregation, but what matter facts when there is a bloody flag to be waved

Worse, NGLTF then claims that Republicans have voted against black interest by supporting Social Security reform (although private accounts would have been a better deal for blacks), and opposing affirmative action (race-based preferential treatment), raising the minimum wage (which makes it less likely underclass blacks will find entry-level jobs), federalizing education, and the budget-busting and all-round ill-conceived Medicaid expansion.

Wouldn't arguments showing that same-sex marriage is, in fact, "moral" have been more to the point?

Diversity Politics 3-Your Gay Dollars at Work. The irascible Jeff Gannon notes that the Human Rights Campaign both endorses and gives money to cop-bashing Ga. Rep Cynthia McKinney, now facing a tough primary fight against challenges who are both pro-gay and don't believe George Bush ordered that the planes be flown into the twin towers.