Blocking Sexual Development In Gender-Nonconforming Kids

by on

Puberty blockers stop sexual development, which after enough time won’t resume when blockers are stopped. When adults make the decision to transition, doctors have full packages to work with. But when sexual development is stopped before puberty, that’s not the case and the ability to have sexual activity leading to orgasm is likely to be gone or extremely diminished. That’s an inconvenient truth at odds with woke gender theory and the lucrative business of transing the kids.

And this:

Common-sense comments below are sure to make the LGBTQ+ woke kool-aid drinkers apoplectic. Heresy of the highest order against the new progressive faith that must never be challenged!

7 Comments for “Blocking Sexual Development In Gender-Nonconforming Kids”

  1. posted by Edward TJ Brown on

    Again, what to do with transsexuals and hermathidites when they are young?

    • posted by agee on

      As Edward TJ Brown keeps repeating his comment, I’ll repeat my prior response:
      It’s extremely clear from multiple studies (remember, follow the science?), that minors with gender dysphoria are extremely likely to become comfortable with their biological sex (and, typically, their homosexuality) post-adolescence and by their early 20s. Putting minors on puberty blockers (not easily reversible, with life-long consequences for sexual development and which almost inevitably begins the road to surgery), is the woke version of conversion therapy, but because it has the approval of the left, all the progressives fall in line to champion it.
      The small percentage of people who, as adults, want to gender-transition (many of whom did not display gender-nonconforming behavior as children!) can do so as adults. It is a far greater crime to facilitate this among minors who are likely to otherwise be happy and healthy gay men and lesbian women than it is to delay the procedure for the small minority of actual adult transsexuals.

  2. posted by Edward TJ Brown on

    Hmmm. You still didnt answer my question.

    • posted by agee on

      I did answer your question. As the vast majority of gender nonconforming kids will post-puberty become comfortable in their bodies, blockers and surgery should be delayed until adulthood. That is the solution that does the most good for the most people.

  3. posted by Tom Scharbach on

    “It’s extremely clear from multiple studies (remember, follow the science?), that minors with gender dysphoria are extremely likely to become comfortable with their biological sex (and, typically, their homosexuality) post-adolescence and by their early 20s. Putting minors on puberty blockers (not easily reversible, with life-long consequences for sexual development and which almost inevitably begins the road to surgery), is the woke version of conversion therapy, but because it has the approval of the left, all the progressives fall in line to champion it.”

    “The small percentage of people who, as adults, want to gender-transition (many of whom did not display gender-nonconforming behavior as children!) can do so as adults. It is a far greater crime to facilitate this among minors who are likely to otherwise be happy and healthy gay men and lesbian women than it is to delay the procedure for the small minority of actual adult transsexuals.”

    A fair reading of the questions that Edward has asking is that Edward is asking for facts and data to back up the undocumented claims you and Stephen (e.g. “Effeminacy Warrants Castration?”, “Stand Up to Insanity Destroying Gay Kids and You’re a ‘Hater’”, “Castrate and Sterilize Pre-Adolescent Gay Kids or You’re Not Woke”, “Castration Cult”) have been making on IGF for the last two years.

    What I’ve seen is a lot of polemic, but nothing much in the way of facts or data.

    So why don’t you start by answering a simple question: “How many boys under the age of 18 are castrated in the United States each year?”

  4. posted by agee on

    Tom the sophist strikes again. The answer is not easily available, but any castrations of minor boys who are gender nonconforming is too many. If an anti-gay regime were doing this, maybe you could see that.

  5. posted by Tom Scharbach on

    “Tom the sophist strikes again.”

    I ask for a fact. You don’t have facts, so you label the question sophistry (the use of fallacious arguments, especially with the intention of deceiving). Typical.

    “The answer is not easily available …”

    The number of castrations among children is very small, but probably larger than you think. The procedure is indicated in (a) cases of undescended testicles when the testicles are poorly developed, abnormal or dead tissue, (b) in some cases of testicular injury, and (c) in cases of testicular cancer or pre-cancerous conditions.

    “… but any castrations of minor boys who are gender nonconforming is too many. If an anti-gay regime were doing this, maybe you could see that.”

    Okay, so let me narrow the question: “How many boys under the age of 18 are castrated in the United States each year for the purpose of correcting gender nonconformity?”

    As far as I am aware, none of the medical associations in the United States recommend surgical castration of minors for the purpose of treating gender dysphoria, so it is not likely that reputable doctors would perform the procedure.

    The American College of Pediatricians, a social conservative advocacy group, doesn’t mention castration of minors as an issue. If castration of minors was an issue, you can bet that the article, which opposes treatment of gender dysphoria in children in almost all forms, would at least mention it.

    I can’t find a single case of a reported castration of a minor for the treatment of gender dysphora in the United States. Can you?

Comments are closed.