The Contradictions of LGB + T

At some point, the fact that young gay kids are feeling pressured to identify as transgender will need to be addressed instead of ignored.

As Debra Soh writes:

“Transgender activism has successfully piggybacked onto the hard-won victories of the gay rights movement. The public understands that attitudes towards gay people were once abhorrent, and they also understand that many interventions aimed at “changing” gay people were unethical. Most empathic people have consequently been persuaded that being transgender is the same, in this regard, as being gay—that it is something that shouldn’t be questioned and is also immutable.

Yet of children who exhibit signs of gender dysphoria, we aren’t yet able to tell who will fall into the category of those who will desist (which is the majority) as opposed to the minority who persist and who would actually benefit from transitioning.”

And then there’s this. As Claire Fox writes:

“The bile that has been heaped on a single journalist for going against the trans activists’ script on the Gender Recognition Act is replicated in academia, political parties, and a whole manner of public institutions. The price for even raising the debate is to be labelled a bigot and to have one’s reputation trashed.”

Julie Bindel writes:

“On reflection, I should have known when I accepted the invitation from Goldstein that trouble would follow. One of the scheduled performers was Reece Lyons, whose poem, “I am a Woman, and I have a penis,” has been viewed 2.5-million times on YouTube. Following my ouster, Reece declared that “the concept of me and Julie Bindel even sharing the same space is, at the very least, debilitating to my mental welfare and to other LGBT members of the audience/line-up.”


35 Comments for “The Contradictions of LGB + T”

  1. posted by Matthew on

    I warned you and practically every other gay blog out there that they were up to no good, that they did not have gay people’s best interests at heart, but instead the Regressive Left ghetto trash just ignored it and projected their prejudices onto me while GAY PEOPLE ARE BEING SYSTEMATICALLY ERASED BY A BUNCH OF BACKSTABBING COMMUNIST SYMPATHIZERS WITH NAZI-ERA VIEWS ON HUMAN SEXUALITY. IF YOU CONTINUE VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS, THEN YOU HAVE GAY AND LESBIAN BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS.

  2. posted by Tom Scharbach on

    I see that Stephen has elected to turn to IGF “comfort food” (“But its all about the children!”) after a week when:

    (1) an unhinged Trump supporter attempted to assassinate a former President, a former Vice President, a former Secretary of State, a former Attorney General, two Senators, a Congresswoman, and several other Americans who have been prominantly featured on the President’s “enemies list” in his recent rallies;

    (2) the country narrowly escaped yet another racist mass killing at a black Baptist church in Kentucky on Wednesday; and

    (3) the country is reeling from the massacre at a Pittsburg synagogue by a rabidly anti-Semitic man who appears to have been provoked from words to action by twisted fear of the hyped-up “national emergency” posed by “criminals and unknown Middle Easterners” overruning the Mexican police and threatening to overrun our borders absent military mobilization (that’s the President’s version, anyway, pre-midterms).

    To each his own, I guess, but I just don’t think that dredging up yet another (what is it, about the tenth post this year?) alt-right screed from Quillette is timely or helpful.

    On transgender issues, it seems to me that homocons need to calm down. The non-binary nature of sex/gender has been recognized since ancient times. While medical advances have made sex reassignment surgery an option that many people find unfamiliar and/or frightening, and while we have not yet worked out optimal processes for handling transition in minors, those issues don’t seem worth all the panic being generated on this forum and similar homocon hang-outs.

    • posted by Matthew on

      Bullshit. This is gay erasure and you know it, and any and all attacks on gay identity and gay sexuality is worth getting upset about, so you can spare me your condescending tone policing because at this point it just makes you complicit in both gay erasure and heterosexual male violence against women. And by the way “homocon” is a variation of “neocon” which is a dog whistle that means “Zionist,” which when used by a left is a form of antisemitic dog whistling in and of itself.

      Sex IS binary, and trying to conflate it with arbitrary and sexist human-imposed social customs that have no bearing in nature whatsoever is proof that you are a homophobe and a scientific ignoramus. Tr*ns is a choice. Being gay isn’t.

    • posted by Matthew on

      Uncle Tom Krautbach hates gay Republicans and loves trannies like a good Regressive Left transcult-brainwashed homophobic quisling. The more you keep projecting your homophobia and androphobia onto gay Republicans, the more you embarrass yourself and the more of us you create.

      Repeat after me: “boys have penises, girls have vaginas.” If you cannot use those six words in that order without changing them in any way, then you are both a sexist and a homophobe.

      Boys have penises, girls have vaginas.

      Boys have penises, girls have vaginas.

      Boys have penises, girls have vaginas.

      Boys have penises, girls have vaginas.

      Boys have penises, girls have vaginas.

      Boys have penises, girls have vaginas.

    • posted by Matthew on

      “But its all about the children!”

      That’s because the trans agenda is an anti-gay pro-pedophile agenda, plain and simple. That should have been obvious as far back as 1970 when daughter-fucker John Phillips wrote the musical score to 20th Century Fox’s megaflop MYRA BRECKINRIDGE, based on a book that, like 1984 and ALICE’S ADVENTURES IN WONDERLAND, was a warning, not an instruction manual.

      Then consider that at least four Middle Eastern countries: Iran, Pakistan, Syria, and Lebanon, ban homosexuality but allow sex “changes.” And yes, those countries are white, especially Iran which passed Hitler’s Aryan Purity Test with flying colors.

      Why do you hate gay people? Why do you hate men?

    • posted by Matthew on

      The transpedo agenda is a real thing and refusing to condemn it makes you complicit in it.

  3. posted by Jason on

    Not sure why Tom thinks Stephen needs to weigh in on political issues of left/right beyond LGBT concerns. But this was posted on the IGFCulturewatch Facebook page, so Tom can comment there about why the left is always right (so to speak).

    https://www.facebook.com/igfCultureWatch/posts/2379032488790414?__xts__%5B0%5D=68.ARDLzZZjTQEWrJBd-z8Hd9baMXaE9BnTF2sCpOe5Z_rgX2rIuOvOwiHUNxb7is7Xp1hez7PPlLnBhKq48SHq3uiB-HV0aR3NDa6NqgAPC8wMsuudx4DGUJBLmcMFMpkmFMoJ6MpzagOoaKdolgUHjVXMiUz9egiaKGe6sw4Q4aAwrnDP9fgh8TgTQQXG3asfBtKUGIXz_JBOaoYGNKkRFZUvXEk&__tn__=-UC-R

    • posted by Matthew on

      Allies say gay, bigots say el-jibbity. El-jibbity is just another way of trying to mute and erase homosexuality. Reducing us to just another letter in an acronym is a form of homophobia. That vile acronym was made up by homophobic kiddie fiddlers and animal fuckers with the ultimate end game of erasing homosexuality (and erasing women’s rights as an added bonus) by erasing or deliberately confabulating the meaning of sex. They want to erase gay people and force women back into the kitchen along with normalizing both pedophilia and bestiality, and they accuse those smart enough to call them out on it.

      And don’t you dare try to co-opt intersex narratives to try and justify the transcult’s war on gay rights, women’s rights, human biology, and language. And all that “third sex” crap is just more homophobic post-modernist bullshit. Male is male, female is female, and homosexuality is, was, and always will be the only normal form of human sexuality, and this pseudoscientific war on gays is no better than a gunman shooting up a synagogue because you are both doing Hitler’s work for him.

  4. posted by Tom Scharbach on

    Completely off topic, there is an interesting article on Politico, “Trump’s Culture Warriors Go Home“, focused on the likes of Michael Cernovich, Milo Yappiopolous, Richard Spencer and the rest of the Alt-Right “DeploraBall” crowd.

    • posted by Matthew on

      You keep changing the topic because you can’t bring yourself to confront your enabling the sterilization of a huge chunk of gay and lesbian youth.

    • posted by Jorge on

      “…he complained that Trump had stopped sticking up for his most loyal supporters.”

      He should have seen that coming around the time Trump turned on transgender troops via Twitter. And “that sleepy elf,” too.

      Well, I for one am not complaining that the most powerful people in Republican circles right now seem to be the ones who are either backstabbing Trump or (especially) waving hello before trying to slit his throat. It does bother me a little bit that he’s enjoying it (he’s too good at this!), but I certainly am not complaining that the outcome is a mix between a more aggressive and less trusted federal government. I do not say this out of any malice toward him or his administration but simply out of a healthy fear of his authoritarian impulses, not to mention those of the Democratic leaders.

      Donald Trump is not loyal to people who are loyal to him. He is loyal to his equals, friendly and enemy. You do not ask the President for help in exchange for your own to him. That’s one of several mistakes. You ask for his help because you, too, are out to make things right, and he should respect that. That he is evil, it does not follow that his supporters should be.

      The people who flocked to him are the socially and economically distressed. So what has he done? He’s done funny tariff wars for the latter. I think most of the rank and file culture warriors understand that. But socially, his way of victory is doing boring Republican domestic policy, and winning. Stop campaigning, just do the things you ought to do.

      “(Asked about the dinner and the feud between the two provocateurs, Coulter said, “I would take what either one says about the other with a grain of salt.” She added: “The only person Milo is ‘jealous’ of is Beyoncé.”)”

      Ann Coulter is as vicious as any of the far-right or alt-right or almost even the white-right. And she will be around long after the others have faded into obscurity, for while she’s been around long enough not to have a perfect record, the lesson she teaches is the one almost none of them learn: class.

      Perhaps I’ll leave it at that for now.

      • posted by Matthew on

        His authoritarian impulses? It is the Slaveocrats and the Slaveocrats alone who are authoritarian regarding matters of language, sexuality, and economics. Why should we engage in free trade with countries that violate human rights? Does that do anything to improve their situation? If it did, then China would have abandoned Communism altogether, not even paying lip service to it like they do now as they engage in illegal and immoral imperialism in Africa. Now I wonder if Robert Mugabe was a proxy for them.

      • posted by Matthew on

        Who the fuck cares about a bunch of self-loathing self-mutilating sexist homophobic hetero male babykillers in womanface and their fetish for raping lesbians to perpetuate the cult of PIV-rape? Consent is a myth under the patriarchy, and the patriarchy wouldn’t exist without the overarching straightriarchy.

        Trump did the right thing by taking a stand against the transcult while still appointing gay people to various positions. This is ex-gay therapy and you know it. It has no more place in the military than the KKK or the Neo-Nazis. It shouldn’t be compared to the civil rights movement; it should be compared to the Tuskegee Experiments, lobotomies, and other pseudoscientific violations of human rights.

    • posted by Matthew on

      And if you can’t spell “Milo Yiannopolous” correctly, then you are either illiterate or xenophobic.

  5. posted by Jorge on

    I’m afraid to look.

    Matthew: I warned you

    *Hides back under the bed. Or is it into the closet?

    “but in the event that a child can grow to be comfortable in the body they were given, it shouldn’t be controversial to contend that this would be a better outcome than a lifetime of hormones and possible surgery and sterility.”

    Better, comfortable, those are subjective terms. Why should it be better for someone to be free of hormones and surgery than it is to be free of homophobia? Do I really have the power to decide the difference?

    To doubt the future is not wrong.

    I see that Stephen has elected to turn to IGF “comfort food”… after a week when…

    Um, thanks, Tom, I kinda needed that.

    Of course, I still think it’s all the liberals’ fault.

    On transgender issues, it seems to me that homocons need to calm down. The non-binary nature of sex/gender has been recognized since ancient times.

    Precisely why transgender power needs to be checked.

    Hmm, too early for that, yet it grows too far in the wrong places anyway. Maybe irrigated is the right term?

    …those issues don’t seem worth all the panic being generated on this forum and similar homocon hang-outs.

    Humph. But for the election of Donald Trump I might not agree. It is very discouraging to see power seem to shift between the extremes.

    And why is it always about the so-called “cons” and “alt-rights,” anyway? Why is it the only thing people call the far-left is “socialist”? It’s such a double-standard in accountability that I’m really not interested in listening.

    • posted by Matthew on

      “Why should it be better for someone to be free of hormones and surgery than it is to be free of homophobia?”

      Ask the Church of England. They’ll wed trannies but not gay couples. Ask the so-called leaders of every Muslim shithole that bans gays but allows the transcult to conduct its barbarous bigoted butchery. Or ask that homophobic prick Bruce Jenner.

      “Do I really have the power to decide the difference?”

      Gay men have the right to do whatever we want, and as far as I’m concerned, putting a stop to the transcult and all the homophobia, androphobia, male genital mutilation, and PIV-rape essentialism it entails. If you support it, then you support men in womanface PIV-raping lesbians. If you support it, then you support little gay boys being chemically castrated. If you support it, then you support teenage lesbians cutting off healthy breast tissue and permanently lowering their voices.

      There is very much an anti-gay left and this is it. Leftybros are enablers of gay erasure and violence against women.

      • posted by Matthew on

        Correction:

        Gay men have the right to do whatever we want, and as far as I’m concerned, we have the right to do whatever we have to do to put a stop to the transcult and all the homophobia, androphobia, male genital mutilation, and PIV-rape essentialism it entails.

      • posted by Jorge on

        …you support little gay boys being chemically castrated.

        If little straight and gay girls can kill children without so much as a Mommy May I, then little gay boys can spike their seed. Trigger warning: I talked about the male reproductive system.

        Discriminating against people on the basis of sex is wrong. Girls are considered mature enough to make a rational, measured decision about their bodies whose end result is homicide, one of the most horrifying crimes there is. What is the end result of reproductive mutilation in comparison, if it grants boys the same authority? Society is lessened, but no blood is spilled.

        We have placed the responsibility solely on the child, and reaped a society of sin. It is the responsibility of both boys and girls to encounter that temptation, and decide what they shall do.

        You whine incessantly about things you know or care nothing about. Putin should put a spy trace on you so you get caught doing a Milo and fired.

        • posted by Matthew on

          “What is the end result of reproductive mutilation in comparison, if it grants boys the same authority? Society is lessened, but no blood is spilled.”

          No blood is spilled? You are talking about male and female genital mutilation in the name of Nazi-era sexual stereotypes as if it surgically removing a perfectly healthy penis was no different than having a cyst taken out. This contradicts your earlier statement in another post:

          “Precisely why transgender power needs to be checked.”

          This is a reasonable position to take after you see the violence against women and calls for gay genocide it has enabled. Heterosexual men in drag calling themselves lesbians while calling actual lesbians bigots for only wanting female-bodied sex partners is not a civil rights movement. It is a war on women’s rights and on gay rights. And to see so-called “progressives” pushing it is proof that the Slaveocrat Party is, was, and always will be a treasonous terrorist hate group that is gladly willing to send women back to the kitchen and gays back into the closet in order to institutionalize hetero male libertinism. There is no good reason gay men should have to copy women to get a man, and there is no reason for women to destroy their bodies to copy a ludicrous caricature of masculinity not all men, particularly gay men, are comfortable with upholding. This is a cure in search of a disease. Serious question: if you oppose both the transcult and Trump, then what are your political options?

          “You whine incessantly about things you know or care nothing about. Putin should put a spy trace on you so you get caught doing a Milo and fired.”

          Project much? After the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, the INS should be banging at your doorstep for incitement to violence. I told you and everyone else who would listen that hate speech leads to hate crimes. Your comments about Adam and Eve fall under the rubric of hate speech. Now you openly advocate sedition on top of that.

  6. posted by David Bauler on

    Yawn. I actually know, and worked with transgender people.

    • posted by Matthew on

      Then you are an enabler and an Uncle Tom.

    • posted by Matthew on

      Just like you enable your boyfriend’s violence.

      • posted by David Bauler on

        My boyfriend is only violent when he has to be.

        I dont get this hatred of transgender people.

        • posted by Matthew on

          “My boyfriend is only violent when he has to be.”

          Spoken like a true enabler.

          “I dont get this hatred of tr*ns jenn-durr people.”

          Spoken like a true Uncle Tom who is oblivious to the transcult’s desired end game of reinforcing Nazi-era views of human sexuality into law and science in defiance of the facts. They want to send women back into the kitchen and erase homosexuals, and if you deny that, then you’re an enabler and you know it. Mother Nature is a T*RF by the same sexist standards you espouse. Don’t think for a second that pandering to white leftybro privilege isn’t doing the gay and lesbian community long-term damage. Appeasers like you are enablers of gay genocide.

        • posted by Matthew on

          These sick assholes kicked lesbians out of a pride parade, yet you have the nerve to call THEM the victims of hatred?

          Why do you hate gay people, you depraved Uncle Tom?

  7. posted by Matthew on

    Steven, when are you going to comment on Don Lemon calling out white men for their terrorist ways?

    • posted by Jorge on

      I’ll thank liberals for one idea with merit: self-hatred does exist.

      You just never see them pointing out its classic symptoms of the need to please some and belittle others because of a deep-seeded inferiority complex when it’s a diversity liberal who is displaying them.

      • posted by Matthew on

        Maybe Don Lemon has a point if you consider the likes of white liberals such as Hillary Clinton and James “Stretch Cunningham” Cromwell rejecting calls for civility. But as for your other point about self-hatred:

        Gay and lesbian self-hatred is voting for a party that calls child mutilation “progressive” and is willing to put the next generation of gay people at risk for serious health problems and chemical/physical sterilization.

        Gay and lesbian self-hatred is defending the actions of or alliances/deals with countries that criminalize homosexuality.

        Gay and lesbian self-hatred is destroying your hearing with shitty tuneless computer-generated pseudo-music while destroying your body with narcotics (which I’m not in favor of banning, BTW, simply because the costs of banning it are no longer worth the perceived benefits to society which the opioid crisis and the book and movie VALLEY OF THE DOLLS rendered moot) and having unprotected sex with one stranger after another.

        Gay and lesbian self-hatred is glorifying shitty and pandering movies, TV shows, and plays that depict every negative stereotype of gays as a cause célèbre at the expense of well-made movies, TV shows, and plays that challenge them. That’s why last years Oscars honored movies glorifying transcultism and pederasty and ignored three superior movies from three different countries about age-appropriate gay relationships.

    • posted by Matthew on

      I admit that i just a well paid troll for Russian KGB, the RNC and other anti-gay organizations.

      • posted by Matthew on

        Shut up, David Bauler, you rancid whore.

      • posted by David Bauler on

        My boyfriend and I kidnap and rape little black and Jewish boys to give them AIDS.

    • posted by Tom Scharbach on

      Maybe Don Lemon has a point …

      He does indeed. People who don’t understand that haven’t been paying attention.

      • posted by Matthew on

        The NYT in another article recently cited a pedophile to justify gay erasure. Antisemitism is of the Regressive Left, and National Socialism is, was, and always will be, socialism. You break it, you bought it, krautboy.

      • posted by Matthew on

        Goyism, heteroRAPEuality and support for the Slaveocrat Party are also contributing factors to white male terrorism. Alec Baldwin is cut from the same cloth as the synagogue shooter, as far as I’m concerned.

        Do you know who else was a white male terrorist? Osama Bin Laden. So was Saddam Hussein.

  8. posted by Matthew on

    If you don’t think that Slaveocrats’ enabling of anti-Israeli racism and xenophobia contributes to anti-Jewish violence worldwide, then you are also an enabler of said violence.

Comments are closed.