Here's a look at some items of interest in the wake of the CA marriage ruling:
A coalition of gay rights groups is urging out-of-state same-sex couples who marry in CA not to file lawsuits in their home states and in the federal courts demanding recognition of their unions. The reason:
"Pushing the federal government before we have a critical mass of states recognizing same-sex relationships or suing in states where the courts aren't ready is likely to get us bad rulings. Bad rulings will make it much more difficult for us to win marriage, and will certainly make it take much longer," the groups said....
When we've won in a critical mass of states, we can turn to Congress and the federal courts. At that point, we'll ask that the U.S. government treat all marriages equally. And we'll ask that all states give equal treatment to all marriages and civil unions that are celebrated in other states."
That seems like a healthy does of realpolitik, although I'd contend that focusing on winning legislatively is the way to make real advances while minimizing the risk of voter backlash (in CA, the legislature twice passed same-sex marriage bills, and the governor who vetoed them now says he supports the idea-and still all could be lost in November's ballot initiative when the masses vote on an anti-gay marriage state amendment that polls show has majority support).
I'm also guessing that some newly married gay couples will still sue in their home states, and that the likely results won't take us forward.
Somewhat related, but on a more positive note, Overlawyered.com looks at the ongoing Miller-Jenkins (Vermont-Virginia lesbian custody) legal battle, and how Virginia's highest court has now ruled in favor of the lesbian co-parent's visitation rights, in a state where conservatives have gone to great aims to deny any recognition of relationship rights for same-sex couples.
And the New York Times analyzes how "Gay Unions Shed Light on Gender in Marriage," and finds:
While the gay and lesbian couples had about the same rate of conflict as the heterosexual ones, they appeared to have more relationship satisfaction, suggesting that the inequality of opposite-sex relationships can take a toll. ...
The ability to see the other person's point of view appears to be more automatic in same-sex couples, but research shows that heterosexuals who can relate to their partner's concerns and who are skilled at defusing arguments also have stronger relationships.
Same-sex marriages is going to enrich the culture of marriage, it seems, just as some of us have always contended.
3 Comments for “Marriage-Go-Round”
posted by q on
i believe gay couples should go back and sue personally
http://www.queersunitedblogspot.com
posted by Michael C. Thompson on
Always choosing principle over progress will get you nowhere, which is why gay marriage was banned in the majority of states in the 2004 marriage initiative. Going back and suing to force states to accept it is only going to get it banned in the rest of them, but ask some of these selfish “activists” if they really care about the lives of the other gay people they effect – like the younger ones, who might have had a chance to marry in the near future.
posted by Bobby on
I agree with Michael. Most Americans are freaking out about same-sex marriage, unless gay activists want a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, they should let the American people get used to the idea first. Marriage between a man and a woman has been a tradition for thousands of years, to get the breeders to accommodate anyone else is gonna take some time. And let’s face it, the more we let time pass, the more they get used to the idea. Let them see that gay marriage won’t turn California into Sodom and Gomorrah, once they see that, they won’t mind if it becomes legal in their own states.