American Consecretions … Global Implications

by on

It doesn't matter if you attend religious services weekly or if you have fallen away, if you're atheist or agnostic, if you think religion is the opiate of the people or the road to peace - established religion in America is an important force.

So when the bishops of the Episcopal Church voted this week to affirm gay clergy, it was an important move.

Ever since 2003, when the openly gay Gene Robinson was consecrated as a bishop, the 77-million member Anglican communion - the worldwide body of which the Episcopal Church is a part - has been threatened with schism.

Three years ago, there was a moratorium on future elevation of gay bishops until the issue could be more carefully considered. The gay Episcopal group Integrity says that this week's vote effectively ends the ban, though others say that it just affirmed what was already the case, that gays and lesbians are a full part of the Episcopal Church.

Last month, conservative breakaway churches in the U.S. formed their own Anglican group aligned with more conservative South American and African diocese. Called the Anglican Church in North America, they have a paltry 100,000 members compared with 2 million Episcopalians - yet if the international Anglican groups choose to align with them instead, that could change.

For now, however, their absence has led to a more liberal Episcopal Church. A committee this week voted that the Episcopal Church should also permit the blessing of same-sex couples, though the full body won't vote on it until later this week. When it came to testifying in favor of the measure, 50 people did so - only six testified against it.

All of this might seem like inside baseball to you if you're not Episcopalian, even more so if you're not Christian or not religious at all.

But it IS important to all of us who are gay and lesbian, for a couple reasons.

First, the Episcopal Church is seen as the canary in the coal mine by other mainline Protestant Churches. They are waiting to see if accepting gays and lesbians as full members of the church will lead to a breaking away from the international church, or whether different views will be able to co-exist happily.

If the Anglican fellowship survives with an inclusive Episcopal Church, it might lead other denominations - Lutherans, Presbyterians - to follow the example of the United Church of Christ and become fully inclusive of gays and lesbians as well.

And once all Mainline Protestant churches start approving of gay marriage, it will be very difficult for politicians and anti-marriage advocates to make a religious argument against gay marriage, since it will be even more clear that not all denominations agree on this issues.

Secondly, however, the entire issue points out something that is easy for us American gays and lesbians to ignore: the rights (or lack thereof) of gays and lesbians internationally has an effect on us here at home.

There is the threat of a schism because gays and lesbians in many parts of South America and Africa (South Africa being the notable, progressive exception) lag behind their American counterparts when it comes to how they are viewed by their societies. If gays and lesbians were seen as nearly equal in those parts of the world, we would have more rights in the U.S. now.

That is, mainline churches would have accepted us already - which would lead to more pressure on politicians - which would lead to a quicker change in our laws.

Our rights at home are affected by gay and lesbian rights abroad.

A gay rights battle in one place - whether that place is within the Episcopal Church or in a city in Africa - affects gay rights in every other place.

We will not have full equality here until gays and lesbians have equality everywhere.

5 Comments for “American Consecretions … Global Implications”

  1. posted by TS on

    I am glad for the schism. The Episcopal church is the most progressive mainline Christian church- it is to be expected, the cornerstone of the protestant movement, even, that chruches should differ. And, if there is an internal difference for a church, why not just split it? The forward-thinking people of the Episcopal mainstream are now unencumbered on their adventure into the future. That the faction they have left behind is currently flirting with making alliances with the third-world dioceses is a testament to their desparation and stupidity. Africa and South America are headed by undereducated and somewhat insane primates; if you actually look them up and read about their statments and ideas, you’ll see it’s no wonder that the institutions they lead are only increasing the ignorance and chaos on their respective continents.

  2. posted by GeorgeNJ on

    Jennifer, I agree that this change of policy in the Episcopal church represents a step forward. And as you indicated, it will be a case study for other churches to measure the response of society and various church members. I am, however, concerned about the reaction of the RC church — who will certainly condemn the Ep church on this change, calling it another major obstacle to reunion. It would be nice if Rome just kept its mouth shut, but I foresee the Vatican capitalizing on this to reaffirm its rejection of homosexuality, and at the same time, try to recover its public image which was so deeply tarnished in all the sex abuse scandals of the past several years. There are an awful lot of people — including non-catholics — who respect the RCC’s moral teachings. I guess we can only hope that more non-catholic churches will follow the Episcopal Church’s lead. If the RCC becomes more isolated, people will not be so quick to presume its moral authority, at least regarding homosexuality.

  3. posted by Richard on

    Jeopardizing the (re)union with the Roman Catholic Church has been traditionally been the excuse with which the conservatives opposed any attempt at change (in the past, female priests; more recently, gay clergy). As an Episcopalian myself, personally I don’t care whether there’s any reunion. If I’d wanted to be a Catholic, I’d have converted to Catholicism.

  4. posted by GeorgeNJ on

    Richard, well said. I guess the issue I’m concerned with is Jennifer’s vision of the extended influence of the Episcopal Church’s new policy on the other churches, and also society: My neurotic concern is that Rome just might throw its weight around in an attempt to undermine (or at least reduce) those positive effects.

  5. posted by tristram on

    “Consecretions”??

Comments are closed.