First published in the Chicago Free Press, May 7, 2008
Young gays and lesbians want to be married. And have kids.
That's what the first survey of the aspirations of gay and lesbian youth discovered.
Rockway Institute reported that more than 90 percent of the lesbians and more than 80 percent of the gay males they surveyed "expect to be partnered in a monogamous relationship after age 30."
About two-thirds of the males and just over half of the females said they thought it was very likely they'd have children.
What's extraordinary about this is just how very ordinary it is.
Ordinary for mainstream society, I mean. When we think of straight young people, we assume they want to get married and have children. There are always those who don't, of course, but they tend to be eccentric outliers.
The gay community, though, has long assumed the opposite of itself (especially gay men), and the mainstream world has assumed the same. Gays were thought to be promiscuous. Gays were artists, not parents. Gays were the outrageous life of the party, not couples who were in bed by 10 p.m.
But maybe the ordinariness of the survey results should not be such a surprise.
The survey participants were 16- to 22-year-olds in urban areas; they've grown up in a world where there are out gay members of Congress, out celebrities and rock stars, out mayors and athletes and CEOs and writers.
They've grown up with gay-straight alliances in their schools, with classmates who had out and happy gay parents, with discussions about whether saying "That's so gay" constitutes prejudice.
Gay and lesbian youth want stable marriages and children?
Of course they do.
Because they have grown up in an America where being gay is starting to seem unremarkable. Where being gay doesn't need to mean living a particular way. Where being gay doesn't have to mean putting limits on your future.
Young gays and lesbians don't want to destroy "traditional marriage" the way social conservatives fear. They want to be traditional - and one state, Massachusetts, allows them to do that. Hopefully others will follow.
These young gay people want what many heterosexuals want: a home, a family, a purposeful life, a job they can pursue with passion. They want to work without fretting they'll be fired for being gay; they want to marry their sweetheart without having to hire a lawyer to make sure they can visit each other in the hospital; they want to raise kids without worrying that their child will be beaten up for having gay parents.
It is my theory - but I don't know this to be true - that as gay and lesbian role models diversify, as we have images of lesbians who drive trucks and lesbians who are fashion models, images of gay men who style hair and images of gay men who are dedicated dads, more people will feel comfortable (and have felt comfortable) coming out.
As it becomes clear that gay people are not all one thing, more people will realize that it is not fitting into the "lifestyle" that proves you are gay - it is not the "gay accent," or the lesbian's comfortable shoes, or the love of club music, or being a Democrat - it is simply loving and being attracted sexually to people of the same gender.
There have always been gays and lesbians who wanted monogamous partners and children, but until the past couple of years, they've been hidden from mainstream society by the gays and lesbians who get more attention - the promiscuous, the party-goers, the style tastemakers.
We love that part of our community. The absolutely fabulous gays are the ones that help define us as being creative, artistic, fun. They're the ones who help us feel special. Different.
But we're also the same.
And that basic similarity is what young gays and lesbians see right away. They have access to it. They know - already! at their age! - that they can have the life they want, whatever that life is.
They can do the party circuit. They can be successful government officials, or artists, or business owners. They can be parents.
Being gay doesn't limit them, because being gay is only one part of who they are. Or perhaps it's that the definition of being gay has expanded. It no longer means only eternal singlehood and a furtive life lived in gay bars and dark city parks. If a lesbian wants to be married, she doesn't have to pretend that she's living with her "best friend." If a gay man wants to be married, he doesn't have to marry a woman and then seek sex in public restrooms.
Now she can marry a woman, and he can marry a man.
And our gay and lesbian youth are planning to do exactly that.

Corvino, John
{ 53 comments }
← Previous Comments
Just like the other day when you didn’t recall saying that the tropical disasters in Burma were just a little “asian stir fry”… even though you had said that just 4 days prior.
Stop lying, Matt. I never said that. You know, given that you’re rich, maybe you should consider having that brain surgery reversed so you can tell the truth about anything. Ha!
And you are PURE projection in the charge that I am “threatening” you.
I didn’t write that you are threatening me. I wrote that you are threatening to publish e-mails and IMs. That’s true, that you’re threatening this. Which is funny, because I’ve never IM’d or e-mailed you. Not that this would ever stop you from doing what you do best: just making it up.
You are one creepy, obsessed, stalking fag.
Fascinating. Michigan Matt, I’ve been arguing, among other things, that you and your friends — Matt Sanchez, your sockpuppet/squire Patrick, North Liar Forty, et. al. — are self-hating homosexuals, circa 1958, right out of central casting. And their worst insult? “FAG”
You’re on record calling gay people (other than yourself, natch) a bunch of deadbeats. And perverts. And when someone complains about the attempted murder of four gay people in a gay bar, you belittle the complaint, saying, put away the victim/pity card. And you
mocked gay marriage as an idea that comes “from the far radical Left.”
When you research what I’ve written on the Internet, that’s okay because anything that a lying, rich, Log Cabinette, A-Gay who thinks he’s better than everyone else is, well, okay. If if I research your words, then the self-hating, anti-gay, never-gay, Log Cabinette pulls out the big guns and calls me a “stalker” and a “fag.”
Not to mention the utterly outrageous things you’ve written about my late partner and his death.
Michigan Matt, I’ve been called a fag before. If you really think being called a fag by a desperate, lying, Republican, self-hating, “superior” Log Cabinette closet case is going to make me melt, I think you continue to underestimate my tenacity.
Matt, you need some therapy. The two of you should work on your acceptance of your homosexuality. You should also work on your anger. And you should discuss your ethics, or lack thereof. You claim to be a good Catholic, so on the ethical front maybe you can find a priest to give you some pointers. Or, come to think of it, maybe not. Ha!
Charles, I couldn’t agree less with anything you’ve written to date that this ranting above.
This thread was about how it appears the attitudes of gay youth are remarkably different from older gays like you.
You’ve used the thread, even after clear warnings from the IGF Editors to you, noted in another thread comment that you authored, to stop the personal attacks.
Do you?
Nope. Like Hillary Clinton, Ron Paul and the Energizer Bunny, you get right on going your sweet way.
It’s a shame because I thought those warnings attached to one of your comments would temper your conduct.
Part of the problem is that some people confuse these mainstream, nuclear-family-type values with one political party or the other.
The reality is that I have known many gay Republicans who were total sluts and whores and gay Democrats who were in committed long term relationships and vice versa.
Seeking out a life-long, serious and healthy commitment with another human being — man or woman — is not liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican or Independent.
Its just that many people really hate being alone, and want someone to help them go through the ups and downs of their personal, professional, socioeconomic life.
← Previous Comments
Comments on this entry are closed.