America’s Unique Gay Mission

by Jonathan Rauch on January 6, 2008

First published in Newsweek International, year-end special edition, December 2007

My grandmother, then a 16-year-old Polish Jew, came to America in 1910 and never looked back. Neither did her son, despite vestigial anti-Semitism early in what became a flourishing legal career. Nor did I, her grandson-not, at least, on account of being Jewish. The experience of anti-Semitism has been as unknown to me in the United States as it was ubiquitous to my European forebears.

To be an American homosexual, however, is more complicated. Few of us feel or want to feel anything but American; but many of us, perhaps most, have at one time or another looked envyingly at Europe.

Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain allow gay marriage (as do Canada and South Africa). Seven European countries offer nationally recognized civil unions, which are almost the same as marriage, and five offer domestic-partner status. The United States, by contrast, allows same-sex couples to marry in a single, relatively small state: Massachusetts. A few other states offer civil unions or domestic-partner programs. Most states, however, ban same-sex marriage and, often, civil unions.

The federal government in Washington affords no recognition of same-sex couples at all. Heterosexual Americans can obtain residency for their foreign partners for the price of a $25 marriage license; countless gay Americans cannot get residency for their partners at any price. To stay together, more than a few same-sex couples live in exile abroad-often in Europe.

The litany goes on. Nineteen European countries-plus Australia, Canada, Israel, New Zealand and South Africa-allow homosexuals to serve openly in their armed forces; America joins Cuba, Iran, North Korea and Saudi Arabia (among others) in banning gay military service. No less important, millions of Americans, particularly but by no means only on the religious right, continue to anathematize homosexuality and campaign for public policies that do the same. In much of Europe, by contrast, homosexuality is just not very controversial. In America, gay people have achieved a large measure of toleration and respect, but being noncontroversial-well, that seems far beyond our reach.

Yet, despite all that, America has some cause for pride, straight as well as gay. To say America is "behind" Europe on gay equality is to overlook that America's coming to terms with homosexuality is a very different kind of project than Europe's, because America is a very different kind of place. In Europe, acceptance of homosexuality is by and large an afterthought in the larger movement toward modernization and secularism. Europe, though more religious than the common U.S. stereotype allows, is decidedly less pious than America-and homosexuality, though condemned by the Abrahamic faiths, poses no conflict at all with secular modernity. If gay people are stable, productive, law-abiding citizens, what could anyone have against them?

Much of Europe has also embraced what American observers sometimes call a deinstitutionalized view of the family, in which all kinds of family structures enjoy equal claim on public recognition and social resources. Marriage, in such settings, is increasingly a mere formality. Children in Denmark and Sweden, for example, are less likely than American kids to be raised by married couples. Yet Danish and Swedish children are more likely to be raised by both their parents. Something other than marriage is the glue holding these Northern European families together. In a post-marital culture, same-sex marriage looks like a lifestyle choice, not a threat.

In short, Europe is dissolving many of the traditions that make homosexuality seem morally and socially problematic. America is not. America has embarked on a harder, perhaps more ambitious, project, which is to reconcile homosexuality with traditional moral scruples and social structures.

The United States is a country of immigrants, of transients, of ethnic diversity. Identity comes less from language, ancestry and birthplace than from creed, community and culture. Americans tend to understand who they are in terms of what they believe and who they believe it with. Millions ground themselves in the Bible, in faith communities or in generations-old unwritten norms, which is why so-called "social issues" like homosexuality and abortion are so central to U.S. politics (mystifyingly so, from a European point of view). This may be good, it may be not so good, but it is a fact, probably a necessary fact in so fluid and diverse a society.

And therefore it is also a fact that America cannot just "outgrow" or "move beyond" its conflicts over homosexuality. America will have to reach a new understanding with homosexuality, one that squares it with the claims of both civic equality and social tradition.

For gay Americans, the bad news is that this reconciliation is a difficult and slow process, the work of generations. The good news is that the work is proceeding apace, faster than I once believed possible.

I was born in 1960, a time when homosexuals were America's vampires: pale, sinister creatures with warped souls and insatiable appetites who lurked in a nighttime underworld and sucked society's lifeblood. The AIDS crisis of the 1980s and early 90s, terrible though it was, helped transform us to mortals. The country saw us bleed and die; it watched as we cared for each other when too often even our own relatives would not. Now, as same-sex love and commitment-to each other and to children-comes front and center, the country is starting to see us as families.

Just a decade ago, same-sex marriage was a nutty joke, a contradiction in terms. Today (according to recent polling by the Pew Research Center) more than a third of Americans support it, and a majority support civil unions. Millions of Americans have come to accept the dignity and morality of homosexual love and commitment, even if they have trouble with gay sex per se. No less important, most gay and straight Americans who support same-sex marriage do so because they believe in marriage, not because they want to dethrone it.

Those who dismiss America as "behind" Europe on social issues often fail to appreciate where America is coming from, and how far it has traveled. Where gay equality is concerned, you can call the United States the most laggard of major secular societies; or you can call it the most progressive of great traditionalist cultures. Or, most accurately, you can say it continues to go its own way by working out how to be both at once. Whatever you call it, I would not trade it.

{ 62 comments }

Harke Ploegstra January 18, 2008 at 5:12 pm

@ Mark, David, Stevedore(who are probably the same person, given that you write in the same way):

You are mistaken, I merely placed questionmarks at the gist of this article, which, incidentally, isn?t half bad. I do reserve for myself the right to be critical of the United States.

I?d still like to continue this discussion with someone who do know how to conduct an argument, but only on the basis sound arguments that pertain to the matter at hand.

As for the ?venomous hatred?, David, that is all your own.

Now my sack of trolly-treats is empty.

KamatariSeta January 18, 2008 at 6:13 pm

Wow, the comments have really been coming in this post.

I’m pretty satisfied with living in America right now. Though I do think we need to make some improvements. Fortunately, I don’t think its particularly insurmountable.

I guess we do have on advantage, in that most people here are willing to fight the homophobes in our country, while in Europe, the muslim homophobes get a mostly free pass.

Yo Yo January 18, 2008 at 7:39 pm

“I guess we do have on advantage, in that most people here are willing to fight the homophobes in our country, while in Europe, the muslim homophobes get a mostly free pass.”

Brilliant! You said it all!! The past, present and future of Europe summed up in once sentence!!

Harke Ploegstra January 18, 2008 at 8:21 pm

@ KamatariSeta:

I wouldn’t call the El Moumni trial a “free pass”. He only narrowly escaped conviction. I wager in the US the trial would have never taken place.

KamatariSesta January 18, 2008 at 8:54 pm

And why did he escape conviction? Did someone decide it was better to let him go so the whites could busy themselves with introspection over the crimes of colonialism?

Harke Ploegstra January 18, 2008 at 9:36 pm

Freedom of Speech IIRC, but remember it was 2002.

Pat January 19, 2008 at 9:55 am

Harke, maybe it is perception, but it does seem like radical Muslim immigrants are getting a free pass. It also appears that some European countries are waking up to it. I hope that’s the case.

Johnna January 22, 2008 at 3:26 pm

Was in Europe for a few months 10 years ago. Didn’t find it particularly liberal or tolerant. Found in mostly a continent drowning in ennui. On the topic of immigration in Europe—I would say that immigrants to Europe is what will save it. Without immigration, Muslim or not, Europe is a dead horse. Also think, especially after reading the banalities from Harke, that dealing with Muslim/Arab Europeans will be a lot easier than what we’ve had to deal with in regards to the lilly white socialist ones over there. Europeans are a tolerant people–tolerant of war, despots, ethnic killings and tyranny. Some Arab/Muslim Europeans with a work ethic and a yearning to be free might just be what Europe AND Amrerica needs. It’s a good thing that Muslim/Arabs in Europe outbreed the white Europeans 3:1.

Charles Wilson January 25, 2008 at 7:45 pm

Rolf, you were cute in The Sound of Music. What made you so bitter in your old age?

Barry January 28, 2008 at 1:56 pm

This is an interesting aritlce, unfortunately, blind hatred for America makes it impossible to discuss. Let’s move on….

solomon January 29, 2008 at 1:49 am

The coming Republican POTUS will have the pleasure of appointing at least 3 justices to the Supreme Court, all of whom will replace left-wing vestiges of the ’60s. At that point Antonin Scalia will be vindicated, child-murder and sodomy will be forever vanquished, and the Constitution will again be the Law of the Land.

dean January 29, 2008 at 1:15 pm

Europe and America are very different places. Europe, being far older, has had more time to realize that homosexuality is as normal as heterosexuality though not as common.

Ash – I feel so sorry for you. It seems you’ve gotten stuck in one small point of view. You also have incredible distaste for other gay men and yourself. In other words, you lead with your insecurities and ignorance. Stop judging for five minutes and enjoy life – you might just get what you think you want…

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: