Sadness, Not Smirks, for Haggard

by John Corvino on November 16, 2006

First published in Between the Lines on November 16, 2006

A few weeks ago I was in Ripon, Wisconsin, for a same-sex marriage debate with Glenn Stanton of Focus on the Family, when the Ted Haggard story broke. Haggard, then president of the National Association of Evangelicals and pastor of the massive New Life Church in Colorado Springs, was being accused by former Denver prostitute Ted Jones of having regular drug-fueled gay trysts with Jones over a period of several years.

"So, do you think there's anything to this?" I asked Stanton, who told me that Haggard was not only his pastor but also a friend.

"No way," he replied. (At the time no tapes had yet been released, and Haggard was denying the story.) "It's just incongruous. John, it would be like finding out that you secretly have a wife and family in the suburbs. No."

(Betty, if you're reading this, be sure to get Timmy a haircut before his little-league game this weekend, and give Mary Jane a kiss from Daddy.)

Kidding aside, my reaction to the story's unfolding was marked more by sadness than schadenfreude. I could see the shock on my friend and opponent Glenn Stanton's face the next day, as further revelations made it increasingly clear that Haggard was pretty much guilty as charged. I was sad for Haggard, sad for his family, and sad for all the people he had mislead.

But he deserved his downfall, didn't he? Certainly. Here was a leader in a movement that actively fights gay rights. Haggard openly proclaimed that the Bible tells us everything we need to know about homosexuality -- namely, that it's just plain wrong. And as president of the National Association of Evangelicals, he helped to spread this view far and wide--apparently carrying on an affair with a male prostitute all the while.

So I wasn't surprised that many relished his fall from grace. A few days after returning from my trip I ran into a friend who, upon my mentioning Haggard's name, gleefully started dancing and singing "Another one bites the dust…" Schadenfreude--taking pleasure at the misfortune of others--is a natural human tendency, especially when those others are royal hypocrites. And it's not just schadenfreude, it's relief: one less person will be out there spreading lies about gays (though others will doubtless take his place).

Haggard is Exhibit N in a recent line of examples of the dangers of the closet. Some of them are Republicans, some Democrats; some are religious leaders, some not. While their stories differ in detail, they all highlight a major pitfall of trying to fight one's gayness, rather than embracing it openly.

I am of course not saying that when heterosexually married people act on homosexual desires, it automatically proves that they ought to have been doing so all along. Whether they ought to have been doing so depends, crucially, their own predominant sexual orientation, as well as on the moral status of homosexual conduct.

Nor am I saying, "If you don't let us be gay, then we will become lying, cheating, predatory assholes." I am saying that a world that doesn't provide healthy avenues for gay people to pursue intimacy should not be terribly surprised when some turn to unhealthy ones. Barney Frank put it well in a Newsweek interview regarding the Mark Foley scandal: "Being in the closet doesn't make you do dumb things, doesn't justify you doing dumb things, it just makes them likelier."

Of course, there are non-closeted people who (like Haggard and former New Jersey Governor Jim McGreevey) commit adultery or (like Foley) chase after sixteen-year-old employees. But it doesn't follow that the closet is not a contributing factor, any more than non-smokers with cancer disprove that smoking increases cancer risk. It's common sense, really: double lives are a recipe for danger. There are other recipes, to be sure, but this one's pretty reliable.

Partly this is because the closet demands, not just a lie, but an entire pattern of lies, which in turn make deception easier in other areas of life. Partly it's because this pattern is emotionally and spiritually draining. And partly it's because deception poisons relationships, cutting one off from the friends who could otherwise monitor one's behavior, offering support, guidance, and an occasional good smack upside the head when needed.

Haggard's much-needed smack did not come from his friends: it came from a public scandal. In response, he plans to begin a lengthy process of "spiritual restoration," which begins with owning up to one's sins. And that saddens me too--not because I'm against his (or anyone's) acknowledging fault, but because there's good reason to believe that Haggard and his advisers will miss the key ones. Homosexuality is not a sin. Making the world needlessly more difficult for gay and lesbian people surely is.

{ 55 comments }

Bobby November 25, 2006 at 1:13 pm

Hey Sam, you raise interesting issues.

I wouldn’t mind some structure if it benefited gays. For example, let’s say you come from a prominent family respected by the community. In the straight world, mothers would talk to your mother, asking her if their son would be interested in going out with their daughters. Imagine that! Getting a date based on who your parents are!

John November 26, 2006 at 12:10 pm

I think the trouble with James and the frustration of trying to reason with him comes down to the fact that our society and to a degree we ourselves define gay people by their sexuality. Unlike heterosexuals, we are not viewed, ultimately, as individuals who happen to have a common characteristic. I sometimes go to a working class ( and very homophobic ) straight bar in my neighborhood for some beers. Many of the people are crude, vulgar, have very messy and fractured family lives, alcohol and drug problems, etc. Would anyone think it rational if I concluded from this that heterosexuality was to blame? Add to this the fact that gay people often suffer from the additional stresses of rejection and blind hatred and it seems to me, James, Rainbow World isn’t doing so bad.

Sam November 26, 2006 at 12:54 pm

I think you make some good points, John. This is something black americans have to deal with too. They have to be “better” in some respects than the whites they are competing with because they are viewed a specific way and there are certain expectations.

But as far as sexuality, there is a strange difference between the two minority groups (gays and blacks) in regards to sexual expectations. Blacks are more accepted as a group, more mainstreamed, but their sexuality has been cut off. On the other hand, the public EXPECTS us to be sexual, because we’re pigionholed that way, and so here it is early on in our civil rights struggle and you’ve got QAF on televions and Brokeback Mountain on the big screen, complete with passionate kiss.

For example, I just saw a movie called DejaVu with Denzel Washington. With all his clout and star power, (and amazing good looks) they can’t have him front-on kiss the co-star? Or beyond that? Are we still not at the point where we acknowledge the sexual lives of minorities? It’s like, sure they let them into the club, but keep your penis in your pants. Outside of hip-hop culture which they couldn’t control, tv and movies were devoid of passionate black couples.

On South Beach down here, there is no problem with gays all over the street, even if they are derided, but when black organizers brought black spring break down here, with their feared sex and violence, the whole police force was called out.

I think that’s interesting.

John November 26, 2006 at 4:12 pm

Sam – It’s simple. Gay men are always laughable, in the end, because we don’t pound pussy. Black men are feared because whites suspect they do it better. It’s a crude society we live in, when it isn’t the best ever, of course.

John November 26, 2006 at 5:41 pm

I really should have read all of James’ postings before I wrote anything myself. It seems clear to me now that he’s just some joker taking advantage of our earnestness and not the screwed-up pious fool he purports to be.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: